It’s about mental health

Right after thoughts and prayers, comes the denial about access and availability of guns, followed by a demand for mental health and better treatment and diagnosis prior to the maniac LEGALLY buying the guns and the ammo, the camo/body armor gear and the rest needed to carry out their plan. This plan is loosely defined but often spelled out or ruminated on social media as a type of acknowledgement and of course elegy as I presume that in many of these cases the maniac believes that he will be killed during his onslaught of rage, if they don’t commit suicide first as the Cops come barricading through the door, or sauntering through after about an hour or so of debate and discussion on the maniac and his fire power capabilities.

In the last few active shooting cases few have died at their own hand. Las Vegas and Walmart are the two that chose to kill themselves prior to capture or despite of it. Do we ever really know what prompted the Vegas shooter? Yeah I don’t either. There was the Naval Yard shooter, remember him? Yeah I don’t either. But this was written in 2013 after the attack and there has little changed with regards to stats. But the AK 15 is the weapon of choice and has been used to kill at this point 36 people but the year is not over folks!

As for the remaining shooters, many are taken into custody in a routine traffic stop, in Buffalo, Highland Park, or walking home as in the case of the North Carolina shooter (remember that one? No me either) or the Stoneman Douglas shooter or the Michigan Shooter who was going home to parents who had fled the scene and a manhunt took place to find them, so there you go. Many parents were killed prior to the onslaught and the problem with parental supervision and of course their own role in purchasing the weapon does little to stop the violence. Some parents were notified regarding the mental health of their child and some had contacted authorities regarding their child – Santa Barbara and Colorado Springs shooter are examples of such. Michigan shooter’s parents literally ignored the signs and we know that the Mother of Sandy Hook shooter purchased the gun but was aware of her son’s struggles and it was all too little to late. The Buffalo shooter hid the signs and it appears that the Grandmother of the Uvalde shooter took in her Grandson as he had problems with his Mother as well. Who doesn’t have a problem with their Mother but killing her or anyone else does not solve it in the least. But guns are often used to resolve disputes. This is a list of all the mass shootings in the US in 2022. All of them are mental health issues?

I reprint the article below from The Washington Post about a Mental Health Nurse who tried to end her own life and after release from care she returned the job that led her down her own path to struggle with mental health. I know that this year after being abused by the Neighbor in 946 and the endless bullshit at Ferris High School by a sole Administrator I debated on ending my life. I had survived attempted murder and rape being drugged and left for dead and with that sustained Traumatic Brain Injury which one of the many side effects is Suicide Ideation. I am not sure it was the injury itself that contributed to it but the endless conflict and issues that came thereafter, from the supposed Justice System to the Medical Industrial Complex, but they did little to help resolve my endless spiral downwards into Depression. I left for perhaps the worst place in America to seek help, Nashville Tennessee, but in spite of it I did get out and in some ways better than I arrived. It took a pandemic to finally heal me, irony no lost. But the reality is that I did it with my own methods and plans and since that time I rely on them as I have the last six years in recovering from perhaps the worst thing that happened to me and inevitably led me here today. When I say I want to be alone I do mean it; however, I do not object to some human contact but it must be on my terms – No compromise.

The story of this Nurse is telling it also explains the drain you see on many who work in the Medical Industrial Complex and why frankly it is so fucking shitty. She is not capable of handling the demands and the resources available lack in which to provide assistance. Shocking that in all places the liberal mecca of Seattle does not have it figured out. Been to San Francisco, the bookend of that? Not any better. Read San Francsicko to understand how often Liberal policies do more harm than good with regards to the crisis that lives in their streets. But alas good Liberals like good Conservatives don’t do well with criticism.

I grew up in Seattle where being Liberal was expected and accordingly accommodated with the idea that like a uniform, their is a code, a speech, a manner of being that is conformity in unity. In other words: Being different like everyone else. With that there is little tolerance for dissension among the ranks and you will be ostracized and demonized the same way Liberals are in Nashville. They are tolerated as long as the check clears but like Seattle is a city of shiny keys and they dangle them to attract the migrants and the money and with that you too must conform or you will be an outsider looking in. Nashville is still the Bible Belt it is in Tennessee where the red coats are not just the uniform of the chosen it is a way of living. It is zealotry at its finest and with that many of the laws and rules you are seeing appear in other red states began as a lab experiment there first. It is a nightmare of which I am glad this time I am awake. The South woke me to the real problem in America, sinister poverty and religion, which are the true twins of America’s endless Civil and Cultural wars.

Mental health is too broad and too complicated to say that it is a single issue behind gun violence. We don’t have enough medical care providers to adequately treat and diagnose issues that emerge and we have become a nation dependent upon pharmacopia to fix that what ails you. We are truly fucked here without dinner. I can count the two Therapists I found useful in my time and one Suicide Hotline woman who just last month talked me off the ledge of desperation. Too few and too far in between frankly. And this woman’s story explains why.

Fixing the broken lovelies

As American cities deteriorate, a psychiatric nurse reckons with the high price of compassion

By Eli Saslow The Washington Post November 20, 2022

SEATTLE — She’d been released from the psychiatric ward with advice on the best ways to limit additional trauma and stress, so Naomi Morris, 46, walked back into her nursing job carrying a notebook of reminders. “You are not Atlas,” she’d written. “The city’s suffering does not fall on your shoulders.” She paused in the hallway to do a deep-breathing exercise and then sat down in a conference room with a half-dozen of her co-workers at a nonprofit program that served people who were homeless or formerly homeless.

“So, what all did I miss?” she asked.

“Pretty much more of the same,” one of her co-workers said, as he turned on a projector screen and pulled up a complete list of their clients, 84 of the sickest and most vulnerable people in Seattle. Most of them had been chronically homeless before getting placed into subsidized apartment buildings downtown. Many suffered from severe psychiatric disorders, at least half were addicted to methamphetamine or opioids, several were homicidal and suicidal, and ever since the pandemic began altering the character of American cities, almost every one of them had been getting progressively worse.

“He assaulted his neighbor and started a fire in his room last night,” read a caseworker’s daily report about one of Naomi’s patients, as she took out a pen and began to write notes. “Delusional. Paranoid. Police and fire called to the scene.”

“Spotted walking through traffic wearing bizarre attire,” read another daily report, on her next patient. “Menacing, disheveled, open wounds to face and ear.”

“Using a bucket as a toilet,” read another.

“Lonely. Sent texts asking how to hold a gun in case she decides to shoot herself.”

For the last two and a half years, this was how Naomi and her team of caseworkers, clinicians and addiction specialists at the nonprofit Downtown Emergency Service Center had started each morning: by making a day-by-day accounting of the rising mental health crisis that had overwhelmed and transformed Seattle and so many other places in the country. Just like most major metropolitan areas, from New York to Denver to Los Angeles, the greater King County area had experienced a historic spike in homelessness, suicides, homicides and drug overdoses in the last few years, overwhelming its already under-resourced mental health systems. The average wait time for inpatient psychiatric treatment had risen to a record 44 days. The Seattle Police Department had lost 27 percent of its force in the last two years and was increasingly reluctant to intervene in any situation involving a mental health crisis because of new laws limiting use of force. The government-run crisis team that had once responded within hours to evaluate and detain people who were considered an imminent danger to themselves or to others was now backlogged by weeks or sometimes months.

“So many parts of the system are breaking down,” one King County politician had said, and that meant it was increasingly Naomi alone who responded to each of her patients’ medical emergencies, who tried to administer their monthly antipsychotic medications, who tested their drugs for deadly traces of fentanyl, who treated them for lice, who coaxed them into appropriate clothing, who counseled them through violent delusions, who was herself often threatened and sometimes assaulted, and who occasionally went to conduct routine welfare checks and found her patients dead.

And it had been Naomi again whom King County chose to represent all of its front-line health-care workers in August and September, when she stood alongside local leaders as they declared a citywide mental health emergency and proposed a $1.25 billion tax levy in part to fund five new mental health crisis centers. “We need to fix what’s broken, and I’m part of what’s broken,” she’d said from the lectern in August, and then two months later she’d taken the day off from work, sent a few goodbye messages, and tried to poison herself by overdosing on insulin. She’d spent three days in the hospital and five more in the psych ward processing all of her recent trauma, and now she’d come back to work to find out if what had happened to her and to her city over the last few years was in fact still fixable.

“Attacked his oven and other appliances last night in what he says was self-defense,” went the next daily report, and Naomi closed her eyes and counted her breaths.

“Refusing meds and making disturbing comments about children — concerning given his history.”

“Oh no. Not again,” Naomi said. She’d been visiting that patient in his downtown apartment throughout the pandemic, and when he was taking his antipsychotic medication, he could be charming and polite. But whenever he stopped taking his medication, he acted out in frightening ways around the city. He’d been arrested and briefly jailed for trespassing, use of a weapon, harassment, indecent exposure and at least a half-dozen assaults.

“I don’t want this to turn into the next major incident,” she said. “He’s really talking about kids?”

“Yeah. It’s not headed in a good direction,” her co-worker said.

“Do we have a plan?” she asked, and she looked around the table for a moment even as she realized she already knew the plan, because it was the same for every patient on her list. At least nine people were spiraling into full-fledged crisis, and she was the only nurse on her shift.

“I’ll go see what I can do to help him,” she said.

She’d spent the last decade working as a psychiatric nurse in the most destitute parts of the city because she thought every crisis could be overcome. She’d dealt with mental illness in her own family. She’d bounced through foster care systems and abusive relationships, and she’d been homeless in Seattle herself in the late 1990s before going back to school. Her life had convinced her that anyone was capable of getting better, but lately that belief was being challenged, because each time she went to see a patient she found herself preparing for the worst.

She put up her hair so nobody could yank it. She took out her earrings so they wouldn’t get pulled. She packed a bag of antipsychotic drugs and overdose-reversal medications and then drove downtown to a subsidized apartment building called the Morrison, with 200 units reserved mostly for people with severe and persistent psychiatric disorders. Outside the entrance, six people were huddled together smoking methamphetamine. A middle-aged man in the lobby was banging his head against a trash can. A woman wearing no pants stepped off the elevator, spotted Naomi, and started throwing punches at the air. “You African,” she shouted. “You filthy Nigerian.”

“Good morning, lovelies,” Naomi said, smiling and greeting each person by name. She walked deeper into the lobby and saw the patient she’d come looking for, the man who had been refusing his medication and having delusions about children. He was mumbling to himself, pacing and spooning yogurt into his mouth with his fingers. Naomi walked over and put her hand on his shoulder.

“Okay, my friend. What arm are we doing today?” she asked, hoping to catch him off guard and administer his shot of medication quickly, so there was no time for indecision or debate.

“Huh?” he asked. “Who sent you?”

“Nobody. It’s just time again for your monthly dose,” she said, as she pulled out a vial of the long-acting medication that helped to keep him stable and limit his delusions. “Right arm or left?”

He tucked his arms behind his back. “No way,” he said. “There’s bad stuff in there.”

“It’s the same medication you’ve been taking for years,” she said. “It’s been good for you.”

“You don’t understand. People are trying to kill me!” he shouted, and he slammed his yogurt into a trash can and hurried past her. Naomi put his medication back into her bag, walked into the office of the building’s clinical director and shook her head.

“No luck, huh?” Tim Clark said. He pulled up a file on his computer and showed Naomi the patient’s latest incident report, from a few days earlier: “He said, ‘Someone is poisoning me and wants me to hurt a boy. I don’t hurt children. I don’t want to. But she said that’s the only way she would stop poisoning me.’”

“He’s decompensating,” Naomi said. “It’s probably going to get worse.”

“What the hell do we do?” Clark asked. Before the pandemic, the plan would have been fairly straightforward. Whenever people became an imminent threat to themselves or to others, the staff at the Morrison would call for one of the designated crisis responders (DCRs), the only people in King County with the legal power to evaluate and then commit someone to mandatory mental health treatment. Usually, within a few days, the person in crisis would be evaluated and then probably hospitalized for weeks or often months, until they’d stabilized enough to return to the community. But now hundreds more people were in crisis all across King County, those crises were becoming ever more urgent, and the understaffed DCR teams couldn’t keep up with a record number of requests.

Their average wait time to evaluate someone exhibiting homicidal or suicidal tendencies in King County had tripled during the pandemic, to an average of 277 hours. The staff at the Morrison had been waiting two months for a crisis evaluation on a resident who often ran through the hallways naked and compulsively flooded her apartment with so much water and human waste that it ran down the hallway, into the elevator shaft, and through the ceiling in the main lobby, causing more than $60,000 in damage to the building. They’d been waiting several weeks for crisis response on a resident who kept threatening people with a pocket knife; and on another, who had spent four weeks walking around with a dislocated arm, his condition worsening as he remained too disoriented to accept treatment; and on another, who was hoarding garbage in his apartment and defecating on the floor.

It increasingly felt to Clark like many of his residents were being neglected by the system, left to suffer and unravel in any variety of horrific ways. Thirty residents had died inside the building since the beginning of the pandemic, more than four times the normal rate. Overdoses had doubled, and assaults were up.

“I hate that he keeps talking about kids,” Clark said. “I’d sleep a lot easier if he’d just take his medication. He’s capable of some pretty scary stuff.”

“We can’t force him to take it, but I’ll keep trying,” Naomi said. “I’ll come back every day. I’ll be here tomorrow.”

“But what about between now and then?” Clark asked.

“I’m going to try not to think about it,” she said.

Her therapist had told her she was suffering from post-traumatic stress and work-induced anxiety. Innocuous sounds startled her several times each day. Her hands sometimes shook involuntarily. “Clear evidence of both personal trauma and secondary trauma,” her therapist had called it. She’d suggested that Naomi consider changing jobs, but Naomi wasn’t ready to abandon her patients, so each morning she kept going into work with a list of people who required urgent care.

The next morning, she was back at the Morrison, hoping to try again with the patient who was talking about children. She knocked on his door and called out his name. “I’ve got your medicine,” she said, but he didn’t respond. She took out her notebook, put a question mark next to his name, and moved on to the next patient on her list.

It was a man lying shirtless in his apartment and compulsively rubbing his head. There was a dead mouse in his kitchen and a plate of rotting food in the microwave. “Why are you here? Did I start killing people or something?” the patient asked, genuinely confused, and then he started to cry. “No. You haven’t killed anybody,” Naomi assured him. “You’re doing just fine.” He refused to take his medication, so she picked up some of his trash and left the pills next to his bed.

Next on her list was a man who took off his shirt and kept trying to hug her as she gently pushed him away. Next was a woman who had overdosed two days earlier at a nearby public fountain. Next was a woman who refused to acknowledge that she had cancer and instead believed she was pregnant with 100 snake babies. Next were three more patients, who needed monthly antipsychotic injections, and then finally there was only one name left on her list — a patient suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was five days overdue for his medication and had started harassing neighbors and punching walls.

“Can you come down to the lobby for your shot?” she asked him, over the phone, and to her surprise a few minutes later he was striding off the elevator, smiling at her, flashing a thumbs up. He followed her to a small room in the apartment lobby and rolled up his sleeves as he watched her prepare the shot. She showed him the label on his medication and explained all the likely side effects: drooling, vomiting, restlessness, headaches.

“I don’t like being scared,” he said.

“You’re safe,” she reassured him. “I’m here to help.”

“Just don’t poison me, okay?” he said, and as he watched her put on her gloves, he began to fidget and whisper to himself.

“Go away,” he said. “Shut up. … No, stop that.”

“Are you all right?” Naomi asked. “Do you still want to do this?”

He nodded at her and then clenched his fist and banged his thigh. “Get out of my head, idiot,” he said to himself. “Go away! … I won’t do that. … I refuse.”

“It’s just me here,” Naomi said, gently massaging his arm, as she looked out the doorway to see if anyone else was nearby in case he became more agitated. The lobby was empty. The person who usually sat at the front desk was outside smoking a cigarette. She tried to focus on giving the injection instead of thinking of all the ways during the pandemic that patient interactions had sometimes gone horribly wrong: The 14 times in the last year when she’d been pushed, grabbed, slapped, sexually harassed or verbally assaulted. The nurse in a similar job who had recently torn tendons in her shoulder while fighting off an attempted rape in a patient’s room. The Seattle social worker who had been meeting with a mental health client in her office in 2021 when he stabbed her 12 times, killing her.

And then there was the last time Naomi had been alone with this same patient sitting across from her now, just a few months earlier, when he’d looked at her with wild eyes and started growling and saying something she couldn’t quite understand. “What was that?” she’d asked him. “Are you a martyr?” he’d said, and she was confused. “What?” she’d asked again. “Are you a martyr?” he’d screamed, and then he’d gotten out of his chair, grabbed her shoulders and ripped off her N95 mask. He’d pinned her against the wall and pressed his hands against her face, repeating something about blood and sacrifice until someone in the lobby overheard the assault and pulled him away. “Oh, Naomi. I’m so sorry,” he’d said, a few moments later, once the delusion had passed. “Please don’t call the police. I’m sick. I need to take my medicine.” She’d accepted his apology and given him the shot, because that was her job, and now she’d come back to administer his medication again.

“Try to relax your shoulder,” she told him.

“To all the Gods and all the saints, please forgive me,” he said to himself, as he nodded and stared up at the ceiling. Naomi took a deep breath and raised the needle.

“No!” he shouted. He jumped out of his chair and stared down at her. She raised her hands and backed away. “It’s me. It’s Naomi,” she said.

He banged his fist against his knee. “Someone will pay,” he said, and then he turned around and ran out of the room.

A few nights later, she sat down for tea with her newest colleague on the nonprofit team, a nurse whom she’d started calling “White Jesus.” Josh Potter arrived from Tennessee a few months earlier with long hair, a deeply religious background and a pious selflessness when it came to caring for their patients.

“How are you feeling about this crazy job?” Naomi asked him.

“We get to care for some really broken people,” he said. “It’s about total nonjudgment and seeing the value in every human life.”

“Compassion. Harm reduction,” she said, nodding, because they believed in the same things. She drank her tea and looked at him again.

“But doesn’t it make you exhausted?” she asked

He shrugged. “Some days, but it’s something I believe in. We’re making a difference.”

“That’s how I used to feel,” she said, and then she started to tell him about the ways that both the city and her perspective had begun to shift during the pandemic, after commuters, tourists and even most other social workers stopped going downtown and many of her patients were left increasingly on their own without the adequate medical care or societal guardrails to keep their illnesses in check. She’d put on a mask, suffered through three rounds of covid and continued to visit her patients each day. Her team’s goal was to help people improve and then graduate to less-intensive levels of care, but in the last three years she could only think of a half-dozen patients who had graduated. “No wins and so many brutal losses,” she said, and she told him about the 19-year-old who had been found dead inside her tent, the patient who had jumped out a seventh-story window, and the 56-year-old whom she’d discovered in his apartment a few days after his death.

She had yet to tell her all of her co-workers about what had been happening to her during those months, even as she’d started talking to a therapist about the hardships of her work. She’d taken up crochet. She’d booked a vacation to Belize. She’d rallied her co-workers to fight for better working conditions. And when none of that seemed to alleviate her anxiety, she’d moved out of Seattle to a quiet condo in the suburbs with a view of a lake, where it turned out she still couldn’t get away from her fears, her depression or her rising sense of anger and hopelessness for both her patients and herself, until one morning in early October when she decided to call in sick. She stayed on her couch and watched birds fly over the lake. She ignored a phone call from work. She took out the insulin she used to treat her diabetes and decided in that moment to give herself several times the normal dose, which made her start to feel dreamy and numb. She texted a co-worker to please take care of her cat. She texted her sister goodbye. She took another massive dose of insulin, which made her blood pressure drop as she slipped in and out of consciousness, and the next thing she remembered she was riding in the back of an ambulance with paramedics who explained that her sister had probably saved her life by calling 911.

“Sorry you ended up with a nursing partner who’s such a hot dumpster fire,” she told Josh, and his smile seemed so kind and understanding that she told him what she’d been thinking about over the last several days. The doctors in the psych ward had recommended a partial hospitalization program to help her deal with trauma, which would require her to leave work for at least a few months. Maybe she’d come back after that, or maybe she’d look for a different nursing job where she could see more evidence of healing.

“I have nothing left,” she said. “I need to go away for a while.”

“Get yourself right,” he said. “Take some time.”

“I know it’s what I need, but I’m not sure how I’m going to do it,” she said. “I’m a psychiatric nurse. That’s who I am. We have all these people suffering, and I’m just going to leave them behind?”

“You can’t help anyone by running yourself into the ground,” he said, and she nodded and then thanked him.

“I have a few things I still need to do,” she said.

Early the next morning, she drove back to the Morrison and saw an ambulance and a police car parked outside. “Oh, no,” she said. She hurried to the elevator and took it up to the room of the patient who had been having delusions about children and then knocked on his door.

“Hello? It’s Naomi,” she called out. She waited a few seconds and then knocked again. She leaned into the door to listen, and she heard the sound of shuffling feet and then footsteps coming closer in the hallway behind her. She swung around and braced herself.

“Good morning, Naomi,” said one of the building’s employees, smiling and carrying a cup of coffee.

“Oh, God. You scared me,” Naomi said. She pointed toward the apartment door. “Have you seen him? I noticed the police outside.”

“Oh, that was for someone else — a fight in the elevator,” the employee said. “But I did see him a while ago wandering around upstairs. He needs that shot bad.”

She thanked him and went upstairs to another apartment where her patient sometimes went to use heroin, and where he’d overdosed and been revived by a friend a few months earlier. The door was partway open. She called out, but nobody answered. “God, I hate this,” she said. She reached into her bag to locate her overdose-reversal medication and then peered through the door, half-expecting to find her patient on the floor. She could see four used syringes on the kitchen table and dozens of fast-food wrappers scattered across the ground. A handwritten sign had been taped to the wall: “Home of the forgetful and the forgotten.”

“Anyone here?” she asked, and she was about to step into the room when her cellphone rang. It was one of her co-workers, calling to tell Naomi about another patient who said she was being held captive in her apartment by a man who wanted to hurt her. “Is it real or a delusion?” Naomi asked, and the co-worker said she wasn’t sure. “I’ll go check,” Naomi said, but before she could hang up, the co-worker started telling her about another patient, who was running naked in a public stairwell. The woman’s landlord had notified the county’s designated crisis responders, but they said they wouldn’t be able to come for at least another week.

Naomi hung up and tried to decide which emergency to respond to first, but before she could make up her mind, she heard a door open behind her and saw the patient she’d been searching for step out into the hall. He was shaking his head erratically and mumbling to himself.

“Hey!” she said, trying her best to sound cheerful.

“Get lost,” he told her.

“I just want —”

“Get the hell away from me! I’m on a mission,” he said, as he clapped his hands and rushed by.

“I’m trying to help you,” Naomi called out, but all she could do was watch as he went out the doors and into the city. She stood alone in the hallway.

“How am I supposed to fix all of this?” she said.

The Manhandlers

Mmm good

That used to be a soup by Campbell’s, now they can just name some type of faux grade military weapon in which to market to men so they can go on a killing rampage.And with that it is advertising and marketing that brought us to the current state of guns in America.

Below is an article from yesterday’s New York Times about how guns have been advertised and marketed if not branded to attract buyers to certain kinds of weapons of choice, that play upon two factors: Sexuality and Gender Identity and of course FEAR.

I have said repeatedly Americans are terrified of anything or any body that somehow threatens their identity, beliefs and of course their personal safety. It has been used repeatedly as a moral panic and no greater and more recent example of that is Covid. The way they turned a disease into a political weapon is why we have the divisive natue surrounding everything from masks to vaccines and how we view Dr. Fauci. Seriously the histronics in those early days about Fauci, Trump and Cuomo were mind blowing. If you did not somehow reject, adore and admire one of them during Covid, the tribe will pounce. I feared more of my own, Liberals, than any Conservative. I actually could have rational discussions with Conservative folks about the disease, it being AIRBORNE akin to a Pox or Measles like virus and that masks do work in certain circumstances for certain time periods, dependent on the type/kind each were wearing and that yes a vaccine of this kind has great potential and no it is not “new” as it has been kicking around for a while for other diseases and then I left it at that. No argument, no real push or shove just let the info lay there. The “other” is NOT my problem and I can avoid and do my best to work around said issues or problematic people if I so choose. Damn that word again. But what I find with both Liberals and Conservatives is a real reading comprehension problem. If you cannot concisely get your point in akin to a text or social media post you have lost then and then guns are a blazing. With liberals that is their Trump Derangement Syndrome that puts you in line with him and his crazies and then they dismiss you as the “other.” Liberals are the most judgemental unforgiving bores I have ever encountered. And again I am very liberal. I just don’t vest in the tribal mentality that seems to be largely an affiliation of millennials. It explains the social media implosions and cancel culture bullshit as they are coddled beyond belief. I doubt one could get this far in the blog at this point they would be so, “my feelers are hurt.”

With that you need to toughen up if you are ever going to make it out of your home/work pod. Gun Safety, Gun legislation is by far more important that who said something not nice to someone else by someone they did not know about someone they don’t know, will never meet and have nothing to do with.

As or IF you read the article I have highlighted what I think are essential passages that discuss the rise in gun sales. And this will piss off the young millennial woman, it is WOMEN who are purchasing guns at a faster rate than men. They are afraid! BOO! And the other is that most don’t have one fucking clue on how to use, operate or maintain a gun. Shocking, I know, not really.

Gun Sellers’ Message to Americans: Man Up

The number of firearms in the U.S. is outpacing the country’s population, as an emboldened gun industry and its allies target buyers with rhetoric of fear, machismo and defiance.

A man raffled off a golden AK-47 at the N.R.A. convention last month in Houston.
A man raffled off a golden AK-47 at the N.R.A. convention last month in Houston.Credit…Mark Abramson for The New York Times

By Mike McIntireGlenn Thrush and Eric Lipton

June 18, 2022

Last November, hours after a jury acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse of two shooting deaths during antiracism protests in 2020, a Florida gun dealer created an image of him brandishing an assault rifle, with the slogan: “BE A MAN AMONG MEN.”

Mr. Rittenhouse was not yet a man when he killed two people and wounded another in Kenosha, Wis. — he was 17 — but he aspired to be like one. And the firearms industry, backed by years of research and focus groups, knows that other Americans do, too.

Gun companies have spent the last two decades scrutinizing their market and refocusing their message away from hunting toward selling handguns for personal safety, as well as military-style weapons attractive to mostly young men. The sales pitch — rooted in self-defense, machismo and an overarching sense of fear — has been remarkably successful.

Firearm sales have skyrocketed, with background checks rising from 8.5 million in 2000 to 38.9 million last year. The number of guns is outpacing the population. Women, spurred by appeals that play on fears of crime and being caught unprepared, are the fastest-growing segment of buyers.

An examination by The New York Times of firearms marketing research, along with legal and lobbying efforts by gun rights groups, finds that behind the shift in gun culture is an array of interests that share a commercial and political imperative: more guns and freer access to them. Working together, gun makers, advocates and elected officials have convinced a large swath of Americans that they should have a firearm, and eased the legal path for them to do so.

Some of the research is publicly known, but by searching court filings and online archives, The Times gained new insight into how gun companies exploit the anxiety and desires of Americans. Using Madison Avenue methods, the firearms industry has sliced and diced consumer attributes to find pressure points — self-esteem, lack of trust in others, fear of losing control — useful in selling more guns.

In a paradigm-setting 2012 ad in Maxim magazine, Bushmaster — which manufactured the rifle used in the racist massacre in Buffalo in May — declared, “Consider your man card reissued.”

Bushmaster’s “man card” slogan first appeared in Maxim magazine in 2012. A rifle sold by the company was used in the Buffalo massacre this past May.

At the National Rifle Association convention in Houston last month, a Missouri-based gun maker, Black Rain Ordnance, featured a line of “BRO” semiautomatics punning on the company’s acronym: AR-15-style guns with names like BRO-Tyrant and BRO-Predator. Dozens of other vendors had similar messages.

The recurrence of mass shootings has provided reliable opportunities for the industry and its allies. Since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School a decade ago, gun sales have almost always risen sharply in the aftermath of major shootings, as buyers snap up firearms they worry will disappear from stores.

“Drawing attention to the concern that firearm sales could be further restricted will have a great impact on anxious buyers,” a firearms industry study from 2017 advised.

At the same time, guns rights groups have pushed an aggressive legislative and court agenda. For instance, it soon will be legal to carry a hidden firearm without a permit in half the United States.

In states where pro-gun forces do not have the backing of elected officials, they have taken up the fight in other ways. The U.S. Supreme Court will soon rule on a New York case challenging a century-old law that allows local officials great discretion over who can carry a handgun, which is widely expected to turn into another gun rights victory.

Gun makers and their supporters argue they are only responding to a public need. A rush to buy firearms often coincides with concerns about personal safety or events that could spur legal limits on gun ownership, said Mark Oliva, a spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the industry trade group.

“I don’t think that’s a marketing trick,” he said. “I think, more than anything, it’s consumer demand that’s driving the appetite for these firearms.”

Whatever the source of Americans’ sense of unease, the result is a country flooded with firearms and no end in sight.

“Fear,” said Darrell Miller, co-director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, “is an incredibly powerful motivator.”

Marketing firearms for personal protection is nothing new. For the better part of the last century, certain gunmakers emphasized self-defense: One of the industry’s most influential campaigns was a 1996 ad in Ladies’ Home Journal that showed a Beretta handgun on a kitchen table, with the words “Homeowner’s Insurance.”

Still, hunting accounted for a majority of advertisements in Guns magazine from the 1960s to the late 1990s, according to a survey by Palgrave Communications, an online academic journal. The study found that “the core emphasis” shifted in the 2000s to “armed self-defense,” and that the percentage of hunting-related ads had dropped to about 10 percent by 2019.

This transition was accompanied by a surge in popularity of the Glock semiautomatic handgun and AR-15-type rifle, first widely used by law enforcement and in the military, in its fully automatic version. That provided a built-in market among veterans and former police officers, but also kicked off an effort to woo millions of men who liked to buy gear that made them feel like soldiers and the police.

In 2009, a marketing firm hired by Remington to push its Bushmaster AR-15s settled on an ad campaign targeting civilians who “aspired” to be part of law enforcement. The first draft of the new pitch, later obtained by lawyers representing parents of children killed at Sandy Hook, exhorted buyers to use their new rifles to “Clear the Crack House,” “Ice the Perp” and “Save the Hostage.”

The company toned down the language but embraced the idea of trafficking in fears of urban crime and mass shootings, the documents showed.

Josh Sugarmann, founder of the Violence Policy Center, a gun control group that tracks firearms advertising and marketing, said the firearms industry became adept at exploiting disquieting developments to spur sales.

“If you look back, it hasn’t just revolved around mass shootings. They tailored their marketing to Katrina, Y2K, 9/11, pretty much everything,” he said. “Their goal is basically to induce a Pavlovian response: ‘If there’s a crisis, you must go get a gun.’”

Industry data shows that in 1990, an estimated 74,000 military-style rifles were manufactured for domestic sale in the U.S. That figure began to climb after expiration of the federal assault weapons ban in 2004 and reached 2.3 million in 2013, the year after Sandy Hook, when AR-style guns accounted for about a quarter of all sales revenue, according to the Firearms Retailer Survey, an annual report by the industry trade association.

Along with the rise in gun sales has been an intensifying effort by the industry to understand — and influence — the American consumer. In 2016, the trade association commissioned its first “consumer segmentation” study that developed profiles of potential gun buyers with labels like “Unarmed Aaron” and “Weaponless Wendy,” who presumably could succumb to the right sales pitch.

The newest study, produced last year, is closely held and not circulated outside the industry, but a copy was obtained by The Times. It found that typical gun owners were white men in their 40s earning about $75,000 a year with a preference for handguns. “Less than half consider themselves to be very knowledgeable about firearms,” the study found, though they felt the need to have one.

A common theme in consumer sentiment is anxiety. The 2021 study contained two new categories of buyers: “Prepared for the Worst” and “Urban Defender.” Urban Defenders worry about crime, “do not trust others around them” and are most susceptible to the argument that tighter laws could threaten their ability to purchase a gun.

Gun owners “Prepared for the Worst” tend to have the lowest incomes and are the least likely to have a full-time job. They cite “building confidence” and “empowering themselves” as reasons to learn shooting skills.

To reach these fearful consumers, the trade association offered suggestions in another of its reports. One example depicts an image of a woman in a desolate urban setting, calmly pulling a handgun from her shoulder bag as a hoodie-wearing man approaches from behind with a knife. *note the hoodie, not at all racist, right?**

That marketing approach may work for Weaponless Wendy, the report advised, but such “cheesy images” should be avoided when targeting Unarmed Aaron.

“It is important for the individual protecting himself or his family to appear to be a confident person while not seeming eager, delighted, or excited to be in such a scenario,” the report said.

Beth Alcazar, a former teacher from Alabama turned firearms instructor, has translated these sentiments into practice. More than a third of her clients are women, she said, adding that fear of crime is a major motivator for first-time gun buyers.

“It comes from not wanting to be a victim and from knowing there’s evil in the world,” said Ms. Alcazar, who has published a book for women on using handguns for self-defense.

The aggressive messaging around fear has also helped define a newer crop of gun rights groups that increasingly overshadow the more deep-pocketed, but troubled, N.R.A. These groups, supported by the industry, have adopted a raw, in-your-face advocacy of near limitless freedom to own and carry firearms. Gun Owners of America, which lists more than 30 gun-related companies as “partners,” proudly calls itself the “only no compromise gun lobby in Washington.”

Their tone has grown more extreme along with the public discourse around guns in general. The Firearms Policy Coalition, which has launched numerous court challenges to gun laws around the country, used to sell T-shirts and bumper stickers with anodyne pro-gun mottos such as “Shall Not Be Infringed.”

But today, its online store has gear emblazoned with barbs like – “Abolish the ATF” and “Go and Print It,” a reference to using 3-D printers at home to make untraceable ghost guns. On social media, the coalition whips up members with warnings of an “impending GUNPOCALYPSE” wrought by weak or corrupt Washington politicians.

The image of Mr. Rittenhouse was put on Facebook by Big Daddy Unlimited, a firearms retailer in Gainesville, Fla., whose owners have said they started selling guns after the Sandy Hook massacre raised fears of new restrictions. “Be a Man Among Men” was a recruiting slogan used by the colonialist army of Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, and has gained popularity among white nationalist groups in recent years, although it is also used outside of that context.

Tony McKnight, chief executive of Big Daddy Unlimited, said in a statement to The Times that the meme was created by a former employee who did not understand the historical significance of the phrase. “The post in question was meant to recognize justice for Kyle Rittenhouse, whose life came in danger while defending the community,” Mr. McKnight said.

Along with using heightened rhetoric, major gun rights groups have been working to roll back state-level restrictions. Their financial partners include companies such as Daniel Defense, the Georgia-based maker of the military-style rifle used in the Uvalde, Texas, school shooting in May, as well as major retailers like Brownells of Iowa, which last summer ran a promotion donating a portion of its sales to the Firearms Policy Coalition.

“Your purchases help defend our gun rights,” Pete Brownell, the company chairman, said as he announced the incentive.

A major target of gun rights expansion has been laws limiting the carrying of concealed weapons in public. More than 20 states over the past decade have moved to eliminate or loosen requirements to have a permit.

“Owning a gun that is locked up in your home is not going to help you when you are targeted in a crime,” said Michael Csencsits, an organizer with Gun Owners of America, which has pushed for the repeal of concealed-carry laws. “People buy guns because they want to carry them.”

In pressing the two-pronged campaign to sell more guns and weaken restrictions, the industry and activists have been informed by marketing research that shows an increasingly diverse pool of customers. Timothy Schmidt, president of the United States Concealed Carry Association, said the new generation of gun buyers encompasses city dwellers, suburbanites and those in rural areas.

“It’s not just the angry white male anymore,” he said “You’re seeing rising gun ownership among Blacks, among women. It’s really a different thing.”

JoAnna Anderson would seem to fit that demographic. A Black real estate agent in North Carolina, Ms. Anderson appears in a promotional video for SilencerCo, an online seller of devices that muffle the sound of a gunshot; its slogan is, “Suppress the Fear.”

In an interview with The Times, she said she carried a gun while on the job because she feared running into disgruntled residents of homes being vacated. Her first purchase was a 9-millimeter Ruger pistol, though she now has a collection of seven guns, including a military-style rifle.

“We cannot expect the government to protect us,” Ms. Anderson said, “because they haven’t.”

Nick Suplina, a senior vice president at Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control group, said gun rights advocates tended to ignore data showing that firearms in homes often wound up hurting their owners instead of someone threatening them.

“While selling you this notion that a gun may provide security for yourself and your family, which is very appealing, they don’t tell you that owning a gun makes it two times more likely that somebody in the house will die of gun homicide or three times the likelihood they die by gun suicide,” he said.

After the mass shootings at Sandy Hook in 2012 and in Parkland, Fla., six years later, more than 30 states tightened gun laws, a successful effort pushed by well-funded groups such as Everytown, backed by Michael R. Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor of New York City.

But the scorecard overall remains tilted toward gun rights, as states repeal concealed carry restrictions. Those victories have come amid the Republican Party’s embrace of Second Amendment absolutism and guns as central to its identity, a fervor that gun control proponents have not been able to match, said Mr. Miller of the Duke firearms law center.

“Gun rights advocates are reaping the benefits of a history of asymmetric intensity and political mobilization,” he said.

Energizing gun owners with a sense of alarm over the potential loss of rights has long been a reliable strategy of the firearms industry and its allies. Political candidates from both parties seeking the N.R.A.’s blessing traditionally would try to be seen hunting ducks or plinking at targets to reassure supporters that their gun rights would be safe.

But in the 2010s, with the rise of the Tea Party and increasingly strident opposition to President Barack Obama, Republican political messaging around guns took on a harder edge.

Christina Jeffrey, running for Congress in South Carolina, ran an ad in which she brandished an AK-47 assault rifle while asserting that gun rights were necessary “to ensure that our limited government stays limited.” In a Missouri governor’s race, Eric Greitens blasted away with a mounted machine gun while pledging to “fight Obama’s Democrat machine and their corrupt attacks.”

Such imagery has since become stock-in-trade. When Brian Kemp ran for governor of Georgia in 2018, one tongue-in-cheek ad showed him in a room full of firearms, leveling a shotgun near a young man interested in dating his daughter. It generated criticism, including from Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, who tweeted, “This recurring and uniquely American ‘joke’ is tiresome.”

Mr. Kemp responded dismissively with his own tweet: “I’m conservative, folks. Get over it!”

Groups like the Firearms Policy Coalition have filed dozens of court challenges to gun limits, and conservative judges, some appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, have delivered legal victories, including overturning a California law last month that placed an age minimum of 21 on purchases of semiautomatic rifles.

Mr. Suplina, of Everytown, disputed the idea that this was an era of gun rights expansion, citing a recent modest gun compromise in Washington and some state-level victories, including laws banning or limiting ghost guns in Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New York and Rhode Island. At least four states — Delaware, New York, Rhode Island and Washington — have put new limits on high-capacity magazines that can hold a large amount of ammunition.

“The fight is really intense,” Mr. Suplina said. “But for the first time in any recent period, the gun safety movement is showing up, meeting them on the battlefield, as it were, and that includes state houses and also Congress.”

Still, gun supporters are feeling generally optimistic.

“We are just at the start of expanding gun rights,” said Mr. Csencsits of Gun Owners of America.

But lest its members become too complacent, Gun Owners of America has on its website a very different message about the state of things: Be afraid.

“A handgun ban coming to America?” blared a recent headline on the site. The post goes on to ask for a donation to stop “what could be the single biggest attack on our God-given rights.” *uh no that was the founding fathers in the 1700s not God***

Okay, start at ONE

When I read the below article about how the Texas Gun Mentality has been put to the test over Uvlade, I knew that it meant either own more or maybe just maybe think about the guns you own and what you use them for – if – and that is a big IF, you use them.

And sure enough as you read the article the guns they bought for protection, including an AK15 have never been used. Oh so much for protection. Again are you strapping on your piece and going everywhere with it. Do you insist going everywhere with your family when the go to anywhere to make sure you are armed and ready? Do you let everyone know you are packing heat and therefore any sign of trouble you are armed and loaded and ready to aim, shoot and kill. And that means you go to the gun range frequently to practice and are an excellent marksman who rarely misses targets and of course have experienced training in crisis situations to handle weapons and not become confused as either the shooter (since you don’t have any type of identifying marker that you are a “Good Guy”) or the Police and then end up dead by friendly fire, shooter fire or accidentally shooting yourself. Whoops! And well Cops do it too. Whoops! And well you can die too from self injury. Whoops! So I guess we have a WHOOPIE here that one asshole admitted that until it happened just this time close to home he was getting rid of a gun he never fucking used. Still an asshole, however.

The Uvalde shooting ‘stirred something’ in him. So he gave up his gun.

By Holly Bailey and Joshua Lott

The Washington Post May 30, 2022

UVALDE, Tex. — For years, even as mass shootings swept the country, Richard Small bristled at any talk of tighter gun restrictions, viewing it as nothing more than politically driven finger-pointing that would do little to stop the violence while infringing on his rights as a gun owner.

But then, the 68-year-old retired high school history teacher saw a photo of one of the young victims of the shooting last Tuesday at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, a pleasant little town that he had visited often when he coached youth football.

“He looked like my grandson. I mean, they could have been twins. They have the same face,” Small said, his voice shaky with emotion. “It just stirred something in me.”

After the massacre, Small and his wife, Marina, drove nearly 90 minutes from their ranch in Charlotte, a tiny town south of San Antonio, to pay their respects in Uvalde. He stood on the edge of the town square where 21 crosses, for the 19 fourth-gradersand two teachers killed in the shooting, have become the epicenter of the anguish here. Somehow tears did not feel like enough.

On Saturday night, Small, a self-described “devout NRA Republican,” did what he acknowledges would have been unthinkable days earlier. He unlocked his gun cabinet and pulled out his AR-15, similar to the one used by the gunman in Uvalde. He drove to his local police department and turned it in.

“I’m a gun advocate. I believe in the Second Amendment. But this AR, after what I saw in Uvalde, I’m done with it,” Small said as he turned the rifle over to an officer with the Charlotte police department. “I’m sick over it.”

Guns have long been an inextricable part of Texas culture, tightly woven into small towns like Uvalde, a predominantly Latino community of about 16,000 about an hour north of the U.S. border with Mexico. Here, children are raised to hunt and shoot from a young age, and many residents, including family members of the victims, say they own guns for their own protection. It is an affinity that cuts across the partisan lines that typically define the gun debate in other parts of the country.

But now, as in other communities that have been shattered by gun violence, Uvalde is facing painful questions beyond heartbreak over the dead and growing anger about the police response, questions about the proliferation of guns and the permissive state laws that allowed the 18-year-old gunman to legally buy the assault-style rifle used in the attack.

That unfolding debate has even affected some of the families of victims. Outside a memorial service Saturday at Sacred Heart Catholic Church, where many of the funerals are scheduled to be held in coming days, a woman whose niece was killed in the attack asked how a gunman not yet old enough to buy beer in Texas could have purchased two semiautomatic rifles and a massive quantity of ammunition without raising any concern.

She declined to be quoted by name out of respect for her family, which had asked relatives not to speak about “political issues” to the media. “Why do you even need guns like that?” the woman asked. But, she said, others in her family did not agree with her position, even after the massacre last week.

Felix and Kimberly Rubio, whose daughter Lexi was killed in the attack, called for more restrictive gun laws, including a ban on AR-15rifles, even as Felix, a deputy with the Uvalde County Sheriff’s office, told ABC News that his position would likely put him at odds with his law enforcement colleagues.

But others were wary of seeing what happened in Uvalde turn into a fight over guns. As she sat at the memorial for the victims last week, Amanda Flores said she knew all 21 victims of the rampage, but still does not believe that the tragedy should turn into a debate over gun ownership. Flores, 43, said she and her family members own firearms and view them as essential tools to keep their family safe in “a border town.”

“With all of the problems we have right now with the immigrants crossing over, you don’t know how many fast-speed chases go through here, we need them for our protection,” said Flores, whose grandson was at Robb Elementary when the shooting began but escaped uninjured.“All of them coming in, they are coming in as illegals, they can have guns. And what are we supposed to do? Throw rocks at them?”

Still, Flores said she increasingly believes even hardcore gun owners should be willing to accept some new gun-control measures. “I don’t believe in the young kids having easy access to these guns and not being mentally stable,” Flores said.

That sentiment has not been shared by Texas leaders. At a news conference in Uvalde on Friday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) brushed aside the idea of supportingexpanded background checks for firearms purchases.

“Look at what happened in the Santa Fe shooting,” Abbott said, referring an attack at a high school south of Houston in 2018 in which eight students and two teacherswere slain. “A background check had no relevancy whatsoever because the killer took the gun from his parents. Look at what happened at the shooting in Sutherland Springs. There was a background check that was done. It was done in a flawed way that allowed the killer to get a gun.”

Abbott also reiterated his opposition to proposals to raise the legal age for purchasing a semiautomatic rifle from 18 to 21, harking to a time before the advent of rapid-firing weapons. “Ever since Texas has been a state, an 18-year-old has had the ability to buy a long gun, a rifle, and since that time, it seemed that it has only been in the past decade or two that we have had school shootings,” Abbott said. “So, for a century and a half, 18-year-olds could buy rifles and we didn’t have school shootings, but we do now.”

Reiterating comments he made after those earlier shootings, Abbott suggested focusing instead on mental health services. “Maybe we are focusing our attention on the wrong thing,” Abbott said, referring to the debate over gun control. In a video played that day at the NRA convention in Houston, he more forcefully rejected calls for new gun laws, saying that existing ones elsewhere “have not stopped madmen from carrying out evil acts.”

His comments in Uvalde drew outrage from state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat whose district stretches from San Antonio to Uvalde. Gutierrez stood up and began shouting at the governor, urging him to convene a special session to address gun violence.

Gutierrez later mocked the suggestion by Abbott that firearms today are comparable to the weapons that were in circulation when Texas became a state in 1845. “This is not the time when we are out killing squirrels anymore. Times and technology have changed. These kids are buying AR-15s,” Gutierrez said. “If he wanted to show any fortitude whatsoever, change the age to 21 or 24.”

Outside Robb Elementary, where he was trying to catch a glimpse of President Biden on Sunday, Edgar Sanchez said his daughter was a fourth-grader at the school but left early that day, a decision that might have saved her life but has left her traumatized. Sanchez said he hopes Biden pushes for tougher gun-control measures, even if that means giving up his own AR-15.

“Honestly, I have one,” Sanchez said, explaining that he had purchased the weapon to keep himself and his family safe. “If they told me the kids would be safer if I got rid of it, I would.” He added, “I’ve never shot that assault rifle.”

In a town that many residents have described as “heavily armed” and in a state where it is common to see guns openly worn, many appeared to have left their weapons at home in recent days, visiting unarmed the makeshift memorials and attending church services that have popped up across town to honor the dead. It was a contrast to the aftermath of the 2017 attack in Sutherland Springs, when men carrying rifles showed up to the scene to push back on talk of gun-control measures.

Outside Oasis Outback, the sporting goods store where law enforcement officials say the gunman purchased his weapons, customers making their way through a packed parking lot Saturday were reluctant to speak about what had happened in Uvalde and the debate on gun control. “We shouldn’t be talking about politics at a time like this,” a woman said, as she waved off a reporter.

A week ago, Richard Small admits, he would have said the same thing. A nearly lifelong member of the NRA who has collected guns since he was in his 20s, Small said he has always been a strong supporter of gun rights and still is. But the shooting in Uvalde affected him in a way that the other school massacres like Columbine and Sandy Hook had not, even though he was still teaching when those shootings happened.

“I felt disassociated with it. It seemed like those were on planet Mars,” Small said. “It’s not going to happen here. It’s not going to happen here. And then it did.”

As he visited the memorials in Uvalde, Small said, hethought of his gun cabinet at home, and one of the weapons in it. Small said he bought the rifle at least 15 years ago but had barely fired it. “I don’t even think I’ve used a full box of ammunition with it,” Small said. Along the back of his gun, he remembered, there was a label. “Law enforcement use only,” it read.

Small recalled how, under the tighter gun ownership rules of the past, he hadto fill out extensive paperwork to buy the weapon and go through checks “much more than this 18-year-old kid did.”

Even now, Small said, he would never support a ban on guns, as he fears some Democrats might want. But he said Republicans like Abbott should embrace some new regulations that would require training for and make it tougher to buy highly destructive weapons.

“This is enough,” Small said. “We’ve got to control this thing. I’m not ever going to say, ‘All guns need to be picked up’ or all that. But the regulations need some serious work. And I just wish that Democrats and Republicans could find some sort of middle ground here,” he said. “Because I’m just so tired of it.”

Since Tuesday, Small said, he could barely talk about the shooting without thinking of his own weapon. Why did he even own it, he increasingly wondered. It wasn’t practical. Hecouldn’t hunt with it. “Really it’s for warfare,” he said. “And I just keep thinking, ‘Why do I have this?’”

So on Saturday night, he called the local police chief, a friend, and drove down to the station. He didn’t want to sell the gun, fearful of where it might end up. Turning it over to the police seemed to be the best option, though he acknowledged that it might put him in conflict with friends, other NRA members and gun-rights supporters who might not understand why he was doing what he was doing.

“But I can’t have this on my conscience,” he said. We can’t keep with the status quo.”

A Moron with a gun…

To counter the trope peddled by the NRA, “A good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.” These morons watched way to many a Western in their day to believe that shit. First of all you would have to be a hell of marksman to shoot out a AK15 toting asshole with enough ammo to take out a classroom plus of students and teachers. As the fucktard in Texas had and this is from CBS news:

The gunman in Uvalde carried more ammunition into Robb Elementary School than a U.S. soldier carries into combat.

A U.S. soldier would take 210 rounds into combat. 

The suspect had purchased 1,657 total rounds of ammunition – 315 rounds were found inside the school, said Steven McCraw, the director of the Texas Department of Public Safety.

A law enforcement source told CBS News that the amount of ammunition that the suspect brought with him is more than what an average U.S. soldier would go into basic combat with, apparently planning on a massive gun battle.

And why do you think that the Cops stood outside for 40 minutes as they sure as hell, despite both training and a law mandating they get he fuck in there to diffuse the situation. But hey a Border Patrol guy grabbed a rife from the Barber he was at getting his hair cut when his wife called and said there is a shooter. As both his daughter and wife were inside he boogied his ass in and started rescuing those trapped inside. Did he take out the shooter with the Barber’s rife? Fuck no, but a trained colleague of his did. So there you go.

Now the story will continue to evolve but we have more than massive evidence that in mass shootings Police inside as well the intended victims are often collateral damage when the shooting by law enforcement begins. This happened in the Thousand Oaks Broderline Bar shooting. And similar questions have been raised in other shootings of this scale, including the Pulse shooting. But there are many stories of friendly fire killing Police during gun battles as in San Diego and Las Vegas. And again this is from supposed experts who are required to train and maintain their skills. They seem to have zero problem killing innocents so this is always not an issue in those circumstances but when it is mass killer, there seems to be a problem there.

And with this the standard responses are given and there once again nothing will be done. We have resigned ourselves to this Kabuki Theater as if that is the only thing we can do and frankly will in a country plagued by mass shootings for decades. And with that add the numerous assassinations, homicides and random gun violence that plagues this country in ways Covid could never have. And if you validate your reasoning behind owning a gun as protecting your family then you must be able to fly at the speed of air through the time like a Marvel hero to make it to the Church, the Mall, the School, the Concert or the Walmart in which to rescue them. Funny that the parents in Uvalde were armed and ready and tackled by Police to not. I cannot find a single story where some good guy with a gun rescued other good guys using a gun. Using a chair, their bare hands, talked out of it, or some other instrument that has no bullets yes. Ask the Waffle House shooter how he was taken out. The Church Shooter in Antioch or in California a few weeks ago? Not with guns. So when I hear that comment I roll my eyes until I am near blind.

The attendees at the NRA Convention are not allowed to bring guns, irony or oxymoron? And with that plenty of morons are there defending if not demonstrating why of all they people should not have a gun.

What they needed to see was the actual crime scene photos, the Coroner Examination photos and of course the Funeral Parlors efforts to disguise the damage to the flesh from said guns and ammo that today are way beyond the guns that the Founders permitted the colonies to possess. A reason largely behind not the war against Britain but against Natives and Slaves that could possible rise up and do harm. There is your reasoning behind why to have guns. Again where are you using said guns you need to protect yourself. Oh yeah on the road.

This weekend closes with a total of 11 mass shootings in total. Well it’s Memorial Day so what better way to remember than a killing after a BBQ. Booze and guns the American Tradition.

U.S. marks Memorial Day weekend with at least 11 mass shootings

Since the Uvalde, Tex., elementary school tragedy, there have been at least 14 other shootings that had at least four victims

By Annabelle Timsit The Washington Post

May 30, 2022

After a shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., that claimed the lives of 19 children and two teachers last week, many politicians, public figures and gun-control advocates said the U.S. government should ensure mass shootings could not happen again.

But mass shootings have already happened again — and again. At least 14 mass shootings have taken place across the United States since Tuesday, from California to Arizona to Tennessee.

This Memorial Day weekend alone — spanning Saturday, Sunday and the federal holiday on Monday — there have been at least 11 mass shootings.

These incidents, gleaned from local news reports and police statements, meet the threshold for mass shootings as defined by the Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit research organization.

GVA defines a mass shooting as one in which “four or more people are shot or killed, not including the shooter.” Several of those shootings occurred at parties, and one at a Memorial Day event.

At least seven people have been killed and 49 injured in the mass shootings over the holiday weekend, according to GVA and local news sources. Since the Uvalde shooting last Tuesday, at least10 people have been killed and 61 injured in mass shootings.

Brian Stelter, chief media correspondent and news anchor at CNN, interrupted a broadcast Sunday about the response to the mass shooting in Uvalde to tell viewers about another — in Tennessee.

“Mass killings like Buffalo and Uvalde become national news, but many mass shootings do not. They just end up being local stories,” Stelter said, in a clip that has been viewed over 334,000 times on Twitter.

On Saturday evening, six teenagers were injured by gunfire in Chattanooga, Tenn., in what Mayor Tim Kelly said was probably “an altercation between other teenagers.”e

The victims, who were between the ages of 13 and 15, were transported to a hospital, and two had life-threatening injuries, according to the Chattanooga Police Department.

Kelly said he was “heartbroken” for the families of the victims and “angry” about political inaction on gun laws during a news conference following the shooting.

The Chattanooga shooting was one of at least five mass shootings that took place on Saturday alone, according to GVA.

On Sunday, there were at least another five mass shootings, including one at a Memorial Day festival in Taft, Okla.

Authorities said one person was killed and seven people were injured, including a minor. The Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation said a suspect turned himself in and was in custody.

Meanwhile, one person died and three others were injured during a shooting at a party in Merced County, Calif., the sheriff’s office said. One victim was still in “critical condition” Sunday afternoon.

The latest apparent mass shooting occurred in the early hours of Monday in Port Richmond, Pa. Two people died and two others were injured during a shooting at a party, according to preliminary statements from law enforcement. The victims ranged in age from 14 to 21, and police told FOX 29 Philadelphia they found 47 shell casings at the scene.

The incident was not listed in the GVA database as of early Monday, but appears to meet the standards for a mass shooting.

It was the city’s “2nd DOUBLE HOMICIDE scene in two hours,” according to Steve Keeley, a reporter for FOX 29 Philadelphia,after a father and his 9-year-old son were shot inside their car in Philadelphia on Sunday evening, law enforcement said.

The grim litany of mass shootings began even before the official start of the holiday weekend, when police in Anniston, Ala., said gunfire erupted after a graduation party attended by more than 150 young adults and teenagers as young as 14. Six people were injured by gunfire.

And on Friday afternoon in Michigan, officers in Mecosta County found three children under the age of 10 and a woman dead of “what appeared to be gunshot sounds” when they responded to a report of a man with a gun and shots fired at a private residence. They also found a man with a gunshot wound to the head, who was taken to a hospital. Relatives told a local news outlet that the children were siblings and were 3, 4 and 6 years old, and that the woman was their mother.

In the aftermath of the Uvalde shooting, many local leaders and community representatives issued emotional pleas for action. As The Washington Post has reported, it’s unlikely that Congress will be able to pass gun-control measures.

Others Words and Thoughts

Below are articles and opinion pieces on the subject of Gun Violence. I put them there for you to have both perspective and greater insight into the issues surrounding guns and the violence they perpetuate.

Opinion

Caring Is All We Seem Able to Do

May 26, 2022

Credit…Diana Ejaita
Tressie McMillan Cottom

By Tressie McMillan Cottom

Opinion Columnist

You’re reading the Tressie McMillan Cottom newsletter, for Times subscribers only.  A professor at UNC Chapel Hill offers a sociologist’s perspective on culture, politics and the economics of our everyday lives. Get it in your inbox.

Bags packed for a long overdue vacation, I saw the first reports: “Latest mass shooting” does not narrow it down as much as one would like, and that is exactly the problem.

Three days ago, I would have been talking about the murder of 10 people in a Buffalo grocery store. Today, I am talking about the 19 dead students and two teachers in Uvalde, Texasone of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. The adjectives are shorthand for our sins.

Two weeks ago, politicians decried peaceful protests at the homes of Supreme Court justices as unseemly and dangerous. It took Congress mere days from the leak of a draft opinion to pass a law granting justices additional security. A few hours after the shooting, Texas Republicans suggested arming teachers at schools. It is the kind of unserious proposal that young children offer for solving world hunger. “Just drop a big wheel of cheese from the sky!”

Not to make light of teachers, but mine used to fuss in the hallways about dragging the multimedia cart from room to room. It is hard to imagine my fourth-grade teacher, Mrs. Sims, armed. She wore orthopedic shoes and often lost her markers in her short cropped Afro.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Teachers with guns is a fantasy, no matter whom you cast as Mrs. Sims. Trained police officers in Uvalde were no match because the shooter had comparable weaponry. We may as well send in wheels of cheese.

What we do instead is hope, the grisliest kind of hope. We hope, in some twisted way, that the next victims will be worthy enough for us to care about. If not high school students, then maybe the elderly. If not the elderly, then maybe the very young. If not the very young, then maybe one of their own. From Columbine to Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church to Sandy Hook, no one has mattered enough.

The problem is not one of caring. Even the people with whom I vehemently disagree probably care. I concede that. The problem is what they care about more and how little it matters how much the rest of us care.

We post pictures of the dead and the bereaved. We do this because we cannot or will not accept that others know the same facts that we know but care less about them than we do. In these moments, we struggle to make the other side care. Parents know that children are murdered. Religious faithful know that the elderly are murdered in church. Politicians know that their constituents live in fear of being gunned down. But other things matter more to them. Winning an argument. Owning a gun. Making money. Never having to think of distasteful things. And winning more arguments. Theirs is a challenge for a priest, not politics.

We also ignore what sociologists would call the material basis of emotions. Emotions are not politically neutral experiences; they emerge not from the ether but from the earth, the very foundation of our dirty, delicious, embodied lives. I’m reminded of research looking at the relationship between racial identity and empathy. In a study that measured levels of empathy among white Americans watching a white police officer shoot an unarmed Black man, the more that viewers identified as white, the less empathy they had for the victim. Commitment to membership in the racial majority can shape our emotional response to human tragedy. You see a similar relationship as it relates to all kinds of other violence. This is not an empathy gap but an inequality gap. People care as much as their material reality allows them to care.

Editors’ Picks

What Goes On Behind the Cameras at Home Makeover Shows?How to Stay Safe During Tick SeasonWant a Nutcracker or a ‘Craft Cocktail?’ He’s Your Guy.

Continue reading the main story

https://7d301c8f53ff6ad2234619cc39686646.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

https://7d301c8f53ff6ad2234619cc39686646.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

As for the rest of us who care marginally more about murdered people than we do about winning an argument or owning a gun or being sad, the challenge is harder. We actually want the politics of hope, even safety, but we cannot secure it. We cannot bring about the world we want to live in through voting, through boycotting, by suing. Anne Helen Petersen writes in her newsletter: “Collective and individual action feel impotent. The idea of representative democracy comes to feel like a farce.”

She is right. It feels like a farce because it is a farce. Petersen names the risk: a legitimacy crisis brought about because our political system no longer convinces those it rules that it deserves to rule. The political analyst Elie Mystal put it even more sharply: “All the people who care to stop school shootings already vote for politicians who also care, and all the people who don’t care either vote GOP or don’t vote at all. It’s all baked in. And the people who don’t care have shown that carnage doesn’t change their minds.” It does not change our minds.

I keep thinking about something else, something related to legitimacy: the crisis not just of how we vote but of citizenship. I’ve written about the consumer-citizen. She expresses her political beliefs through her consumer practices. As consumer-citizens, we have been conditioned to believe that if our votes don’t matter, our donations will. And if our donations don’t do it, then we can simply call the manager or email political liaisons. Citizenship looks like leaving a Yelp review for the representative who was elected in your gerrymandered district.

None of it is enough. Citizen-consumers are ill equipped for the electoral politics we have. That politics is bigger than our preferences. Big donors, both corporate and supranational, have more say than the majority. The issue isn’t that voters don’t care about gun control but that caring is all we seem able to do.

I do not know what will change our model of citizenship. But I do know that the tools we developed as citizen-consumers are obsolete and we make new guns every day.

America’s Gun Problem

More guns in the U.S. mean more deaths.

Prayers at Robb Elementary School.
Prayers at Robb Elementary School.Credit…Ivan Pierre Aguirre for The New York Times
Prayers at Robb Elementary School.
German Lopez

By German Lopez

May 26, 2022

You’re reading the The Morning newsletter.  Make sense of the day’s news and ideas. David Leonhardt and Times journalists guide you through what’s happening — and why it matters. Get it sent to your inbox.

In every country, people get into arguments, hold racist views or suffer from mental health issues. But in the U.S., it is easier for those people to pick up a gun and shoot someone.

That reality is what allowed an 18-year-old to obtain an assault rifle and kill 19 children and two teachers at an elementary school classroom in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday. And it is what makes the U.S. a global outlier when it comes to gun violence, with more gun deaths than any of its peers.

This chart, looking at public shootings in which four or more people were killed, shows how much the U.S. stands out:

Number of mass shootings

Developed countries, 1998-2019

101

United States

8

France

5

Germany

4

Canada

3

Finland

2

Belgium

2

Czech Republic

2

Italy

2

Netherlands

2

Switzerland

1

Australia

1

Austria

1

Croatia

1

Lithuania

1

New Zealand

1

Norway

1

Slovakia

1

United Kingdom

Source: Jason R. Silva, William Paterson University

By The New York Times

In today’s newsletter, I want to walk through three ways to think about America’s gun problem.

Where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths. Studies have found this to be true at the state and national level. It is true for homicides, suicides, mass shootings and even police shootings.

It is an intuitive idea: If guns are more available, people will use them more often. If you replaced “guns” in that sentence with another noun, it would be so obvious as to be banal.

Stricter gun laws appear to help. They are associated with fewer gun deaths, in both a domestic and global context, while looser gun laws are linked with more gun deaths.

Gun ownership and homicide rates in developed countries

4 gun homicides per 100,000 people

United States

3

2

France

1

Belgium

Canada

Portugal

Spain

Germany

25

50

75

100

125

Australia

Guns per 100 people

Ownership rates are for 2017 and homicide rates are for 2018.

Source: Small Arms Survey

By The New York Times

But federal laws are lax. Other developed countries typically require at least a license to own a gun, if they allow someone to get a firearm at all. In the U.S., even a background check is not always required to buy a gun — a result of poor enforcement and legal loopholes.

The U.S. is always going to have more guns, and consequently more deaths, than other rich countries. Given the Second Amendment, mixed public opinion and a closely divided federal government, lawmakers face sharp limits on how far they can go

But since America’s gun laws are so weak, there is a lot of room to improve — and at least cut some gun deaths.

To reduce mass shootings, experts have several ideas:

  • More thorough background checks might stop some gunmen, like those in the church shootings in Charleston, S.C., in 2015 and in Sutherland Springs, Texas, in 2017.
  • “Red flag” laws allow law enforcement officials to confiscate guns from people who display warning signs of violence, like threatening their peers or family members. The laws might have applied to the gunman in the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in 2018.
  • Assault weapon bans would restrict or prohibit access to the kinds of rifles shooters often use. A ban could at least make mass shootings less deadly by pushing gunmen toward less effective weapons, some experts argue.

But it is hard to say exactly how much impact these measures would have, because little good research exists on the effects of gun policies on mass shootings. One unanswered question is whether a determined gunman would find a way to bypass the laws: If he can’t use an assault rifle, would he resort to a handgun or shotgun? That could make the shooting less deadly, but not stop it altogether.

Most shootings in America never appear in national headlines. The majority of gun deaths in 2021 were suicides. Nearly half were homicides that occurred outside mass shootings; they are more typical acts of violence on streets and in homes (and most involve handguns). Mass shootings were responsible for less than 2 percent of last year’s gun deaths.

Stricter gun laws could also reduce the more common gun deaths. It all comes down to the same problem: More guns equal more gun deaths, whether a gang shootout in California, a suicide in Wyoming or a school shooting in Texas.

In the U.S., Backlash to Civil Rights Era Made Guns a Political Third Rail

Other countries changed course after massacres. But American political protection for guns is unique, and has become inseparable from conservative credentials.

A gunman attacked Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday.
A gunman attacked Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday.Credit…Christopher Lee for The New York Times
Amanda Taub

By Amanda Taub

May 25, 2022

You’re reading the The Interpreter newsletter.  Original analysis on the week’s biggest global stories, from columnist Amanda Taub. Get it sent to your inbox.

I am a mother of two young children, and I wish I could say that the pain that parents in Uvalde, Texas, feel this morning is unimaginable to me. But the truth is it that although I have never experienced it directly, I have had to imagine that pain many times.

I imagined it when I arrived one day to pick up my older daughter, then not even 2 years old, from day care in Washington, D.C., and found that they were conducting an active shooter drill with the babies and toddlers.

Her teachers explained that they were training the children to hide in a small dark room and not make a sound, so that if one day the worst happened, the shooter might not realize they were there. I imagined how useless silence and a locked door would be against someone who had set out to murder young children. I imagined the life-destroying grief that would follow.

By then I already had practice at the imagining. A few years earlier, when my husband, then a teacher in a public school, texted me that they were locked down because of a reported shooting in the building, I imagined him being killed, or being helpless to save his students. I imagined our life together shattering.

And just as thousands of children in America are doubtless doing today, I had imagined that pain when I was still a child myself. After the Columbine massacre, my classmates and I talked about the fact that our tall urban school building had only two staircases, two main exits, and how that meant a mass murderer would just have to pull a fire alarm and then wait at the door for half of the school to be ushered into the sight of his gun. Though I kept up a shallow teenage bravado during the conversation, I imagined my sister and I going to different exits. I imagined only one of us making it out.

Commentary from Times Opinion on the massacre at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

In all of those instances, the disaster I imagined never came to pass. I was more fortunate than the families in Uvalde, in Sandy Hook, or in Parkland.

But there is still a cost to living in a country where children are taught that school is a place where they might be trapped and murdered; to living in a country where being a schoolteacher means making a Secret Service-style commitment to hurl oneself in front of a speeding bullet. The imagining, the fear, is a cost in and of itself.

I don’t live in the United States right now. Today my older daughter goes to a primary school that does not have any active-shooter drills, and is not learning that her school is a place where she needs to fear being killed. My younger daughter’s day care never taught her to hide silently in a dark room so that a shooter would not find her. They do not have to wonder if their school will be the next one after Uvalde. I do not have to soothe the fear that would bring. They get a little more innocence as children. I get a little more peace as their mom.

That is a benefit that most Americans cannot access, because of choices that American governments have made.

Other countries, as many, many articles will doubtlessly point out this week, have made different choices.

Updates: Texas Elementary School Shooting

Updated 

May 27, 2022

After the Dunblane Massacre in Scotland in 1996, in which a gunman killed 16 primary-school pupils and a teacher, the British government banned handguns. After the Port Arthur Massacre in Australia that same year, the Australian government introduced stringent gun laws, including a ban on most semiautomatic and automatic weapons as well as licensing and purchasing restrictions. After the Utoya massacre in Norway in 2011, the government banned semiautomatic firearms, persevering with the legislation despite years of opposition from a well-organized hunters’ lobby. After the Christchurch shootings in 2019, New Zealand’s government passed stringent new restrictions on gun ownership and announced a buyback program.

Bullet holes in the windows of Dunblane Primary School in Scotland a day after the shooting in which 16 young students and their teacher were killed in 1996.
Bullet holes in the windows of Dunblane Primary School in Scotland a day after the shooting in which 16 young students and their teacher were killed in 1996.Credit…David Giles/Press Association, via Associated Press

The United States is different. Recent years have brought many mass shootings, including those of schoolchildren in Newtown, Conn., and Parkland, Fla., but essentially no new gun control legislation. And like so many other things about modern American politics, the reasons are rooted in the political backlash to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, and particularly to desegregation.

“The modern quest for gun control and the gun rights movement it triggered were born in the shadow of Brown,” Reva Siegel, a constitutional scholar at Yale Law School, wrote in a 2008 article in the Harvard Law Review. She was referring to Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1954. “Directly and indirectly, conflicts over civil rights have shaped modern understandings of the Second Amendment.”

Desegregation sparked a reactionary backlash among white voters, particularly in the south, who saw it as overreach by the Supreme Court and federal government. That backlash, with the help of conservative political strategists, coalesced into a multi-issue political movement. Promises to protect the traditional family from the perceived threat of feminism drew in white women. And influential conservative lawyers framed the Second Amendment as a source of individual “counterrights” that conservatives could seek protection for in the courts — a counterbalance to progressive groups’ litigation on segregation and other issues.

That turned gun control into a highly salient political issue for American conservatives in a way that sets the United States apart from other wealthy nations. The gun control laws in the United Kingdom, Australia and Norway were all passed by conservative governments. Although they faced some opposition to the new measures, particularly from hunters’ groups, it did not line up with a broader political movement the way gun rights did in the United States.

In the United States, by contrast, the issue is so salient, and so partisan, that embracing gun rights is practically a requirement for Republican politicians trying to prove their conservative bona fides to voters. Taking an extreme pro-gun position can be a way for candidates to stand out in crowded primary fields. Supporting gun control, by contrast, would make a Republican vulnerable to a primary challenge from the right, which helps explain why they so rarely take that position.

And even if that political landscape were to shift, there would still be the matter of the courts. As the right took up the issue of gun rights in politics, conservative lawyers gave the Second Amendment new attention in law reviews and courtrooms, Adam Winkler, a constitutional law scholar at U.C.L.A., wrote in the book “Gunfight: the Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.”

The Federalist Society pushed for nominations of conservative judges, slowly reshaping the judicial branch into a conservative institution that enshrined a broad Second Amendment right for individuals to own guns. Unless Supreme Court precedents like District of Columbia v. Heller get overturned, it would be difficult for the government to enact broad gun control measures.

Shootings like the one in Texas last night are enough to draw attention to the power and momentum of the pro-gun movement. But changing it would be the work of decades. Even if politicians work diligently, there will be more mass shootings before that happens. In the meantime, parents and children across the United States will imagine the pain that families in Texas are feeling today, and wonder if they might be next.

Fuck it, Do Nothing

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” – Dietrich Bonhoeffer

In response to this Washington Post article: Good people do bad things when they do nothing. For some nutty reason it was featured and nearly 900 people liked it. That was a first as mostly I receive hate and with that there were some negative comments, but one was that the truth does hurt. And men have a hard time being hurt. Oh those feelers and all. Well that explains the idiot who responded here about a post that I should get back on my meds. When I tracked him his blog is a of course a Covid conspiratorial one and he is blocked so I move on. This is the new American male, oh wait the same American Male that always existed – armed and dangerous.

Anyone who is walking around now utterly disengaged and uninformed should go back into Covid quarantine. I can assure you had this happened in the nascent days like George Floyd’s murder we would still be on the streets. But nope we got shits to do.

Guns kill. We have the most deaths per guns than any equitable country in the world so what does that it tell you? We got a lot of guns, and many are used in Suicides by White Males so they are definitely armed and dangerous, to themselves. And with that we also have a mean culture and particularly abusive one to males. Which explains the rising suicide rate and almost all are utterly preventable as this article in the Guardian demonstrates. Let me examine this example in the article:

Evan Seyfried, 40, a Kroger employee for nearly 20 years in Milford, Ohio, died by suicide on 9 March 2021, after experiencing months of harassment, bullying and abuse in the workplace, according to a lawsuit against Kroger filed by his family in 2021 that is still pending in court.

“No one was helping him. They didn’t want to be the target,” said Murphy. “There are these people now who have called me, crying their eyes out, feeling like they could have saved his life because they didn’t do anything.”

According to the lawsuit, Seyfried began experiencing bullying and harassment from his store manager for wearing a face mask at work and turning down her sexual advances. Then the bullying turned into sabotaging his department, intimidation, threats and surveillance. The harassment continued despite reports and complaints made with Kroger and the local union.

So he was sexually harassed at work by a woman superior, by colleagues and likely customers given the time frame and with that despite efforts to properly channel his complaints, he chose to end it by KILLING HIMSELF.

Moving on. Or not. I have written about my suicidal thoughts when that Administrator abused me at Ferris High School, by my second encounter with her I was in a better place and laughed and have never returned. That discussion with the Suicide Hotline actually helped me a great deal as she mentioned the issue of control. And yes I can control where I go to school and have since and for the better.

But with this the predominant amount of shooters are young males under 25. This is explained in an excellent theory by Rudolf Steiner, The Seven Stages of Life. I have found this a very useful in understanding childhood development. And this is the key to understanding how these young men became sociopaths: The third seven years (14-21 years old) is associated with Venus, during which time the higher mind of the adolescent takes root, and the psychic development can be disturbed by the strong impulses of puberty. The next three seven-year segments are associated with the Sun (21-42 years old), and the elements of sentient soul, intellectual soul, and consciousness soul.

Now again this is a social psychological tool and yet I have found little otherwise to contradict much of what is said about these salient seven year periods.

AGES 21 TO 28.  Play That Turns Toward Responsibility

In the early and middle 20s, we gain a modicum of control over our emotions and start to integrate our rational faculties, which give us greater control over our actions.  During these years, most people are healthy, full of energy, and lusting for life.  Meanwhile, our physical powers are peaking.  It’s common for young people to feel a certain invincibility and even arrogance.  People at this age are often possessed by wild enthusiasm, independence, and recklessness.  They take risks, play hard, and often make mistakes. 

These are the years that young men are sent off to war.  Despite the horrors of war, many young men enlist for the fighting, always believing that they will not be among the ones who are killed.  

Over time, the abandon of the early and mid-20s gives way to the growing maturity that slowly takes hold as we enter the later 20s and start looking at the approaching milestone of 30 years of age.  As we approach 30, we begin to feel the need to become a responsible adult. 

Indeed, the events coincide with those feelings and needs.  People marry and have children during this time.  Young men have to grow up, get steady jobs, early a living, and provide for their wives and babies.  For many, the wild years pass away.  Responsibility starts to tie us down. 

The compensation, Steiner said, is that we begin to experience the first signs of our talents and special abilities.  We awaken to vocations that we feel a special attraction to and, for some, even love.  Our mythological flights of fantasy and arrogance are passing.  We are landing in life, and just beginning to become more practical. 

We are also learning to think about people other than ourselves.  We are being stretched to see life in broader and more selfless terms. 

The centaur, or the mythological beast that was half human and half horse, best characterizes this period, Steiner said.   The human is emerging from the base, animal instincts.   We are still driven by our animal impulses, but we are learning to cope with them, as the higher human faculties become more available to our us. 

Times have changed and with that the reality we are delaying much of these expectations are again pushing against the clock of our own development. We have accelerated sexual activity via the use of technology and with the ability to communicate our most secret desires, fears and ambitions anonymously has enabled many of the shooters of late to in fact share, detail, plan and actually stream them to the viewers that either share his beliefs or are simply curious folk who really don’t believe it will happen until it does. And that is where I go to most people: Until it happens to you.

The whack job in Texas was 18 he was still in the puberty development phase and it comes to light when reviewing his social media presence, a sick assortment of violence and threats. And along that line another Psychotherapist view, Eric Erickson and his theory of psychosocial development. This stage occurs during adolescence between the ages of approximately 12 and 18. During this stage, adolescents explore their independence and develop a sense of self – Ego Identity.

As they transition from childhood to adulthood, teens may begin to feel confused or insecure about themselves and how they fit into society. As they seek to establish a sense of self, teens may experiment with different roles, activities, and behaviors. According to Erikson, this is important to the process of forming a strong identity and developing a sense of direction in life. It is the conscious sense of self that we develop through social interaction, which is constantly changing due to new experiences and information we acquire in our daily interactions with others. 

And this is where social media comes into play here that can really fuck a head up. We have seen adults fall down the spiral of false stories and other bizarre tales, Q’Anon is one and there are many other conspiracy theories that fill the internet hole which many subscribe. So a young man already confused can easily find an audience or a narrator that can give him the misinformation he needs that can be the catalyst to destruction. And this kid was no different, the history of being bullied, a Mother who is batshit from what I can tell reading her current statements, and then his exchanges on social media demonstrate a boy deeply troubled and in need of help. And he found it on a site called, Yubo. The article from The Post goes onto explain his bizarre rants and statements which sadly were also ignored and thought of as bullshit as many on the site seem immune or unclear of how they too are victims of abuse. We have turned a generation utterly incapable of empathy and emotion. One girl told The Post she first saw Ramos in a Yubo panel telling someone, “Shut up before I shoot you,” but figured it was harmless because “kids joke around like that.” This will not end so we need to do something to at least prevent more carnage.

When you do nothing or say nothing you become a part of the problem.

Not now God.

I am an Atheist so the bullshit “thoughts and prayers” is just that bullshit. Someone said today to me that they were glad the Police shot and killed the Texas mass murderer as all he had to do was repent and be allowed to enter Heaven.. WHAT THE FLYING FUCK? Uh right now I know that a white kid who killed 13 black people in Buffalo was de-escalated and talked into turning over his weapon and yet for 45 mins or so a Brown kid who killed all Brown people was barricaded in a room with dead Teachers and Children before it was breached and he was shot to death. He will never serve time, he will never face actual Justice and the victim’s families will never learn why he targeted that school and killed their children or their children’s Teachers. Repent, fuck that I don’t care about that fake place, I care to understand the reasoning behind all of it. What prompted another 18 year old boy to act on his rage towards those who did nothing to him but just be alive.

Meanwhile while families outside were panicking and trying to find out what was going on inside the Police did what they do best, rough up Brown people and stand around.

Dear fucking god, not now. And of course Texas is not exactly innocent in these deaths. Tuesday’s shooting was the eighth mass shooting in 13 years in Texas, a state where the Republican-dominated leadership has repeatedly loosened gun laws. Top state officials again quickly signaled that the deaths in Uvalde would not likely lead to stricter gun control in the state and instead pushed for arming more teachers and adding police to school campuses.

Let me understand something here we are back to the arming Teachers and upping Security. Well the Security Guard did open fire and failed to stop it, so now what add the Military to the schoolyard? I see. And again the cries for mental health are flying free. There was however little done in the years prior as numerous cries for help from a drug addicted Mother, a Grandmother overwhelmed with caring for her own Daughter in distress and a Grandson who was clearly troubled and angry. And the ability to walk into a store the day he turned 18 and buy a military grade weapon along with extensive ammo and then just get in a car, drive to a school, a grocery store or to a mall or a movie theater or a church or anywhere people gather and open fire. Mental health is the issue or the ability and accessibility to purchase guns without question. To work in a public school you need to be fingerprinted and cleared by the FBI, to drive a car you need to attain a license which needs to be renewed, you need to pass not one but two tests, have insurance. To buy a gun, cash is fine.

Add to the list of Teacher’s daily responsibilities is become an armed marksman and human shield. No thanks. And with that I have said it repeatedly that this is not about Racism, Asian or BLM or any of the reasons that one takes a gun and shoots up a public forum and kills people nor is it solely a mental health issue, it is a GUN ISSUE. And with that we do fuck all nothing. And in comment I made to the article below, I hold US accountable. All of us for doing fuck all nothing. I said, “Good people do bad things when they do nothing.” I know so many good people clutching pearls and throwing stones at Republicans. But they never go into the Republican offices, nor take to the streets the way they do about all the other cultural issues in the same way when it comes to guns. Nope, guns are the tools and the weapons that are used to inflict both pain and protection. We have enabled the Police to use them discriminatory on largely Black and Brown people who have done nothing. And when it is a mass shooting once again show the power of that prejudice in that situation by letting one white child face the appropriate panel of Justice and the brown child to not. We need to hear him, we need to listen to him and then we can learn from him on what we need to do IN ADDITION to controlling guns.

Want to shoot people? Head to the Ukraine or Russia, they are committing war crimes right now. Have at it you fucking pieces of shit.

Americans are the biggest baddest motherfucking scaredy cats ever. They live if not wallow in fear. When I commented that the absurd remark “Stay Safe” was repeated throughout Covid, I was of course verbally abused as they said 1M died thanks to not wearing masks and vaccinations. Okay well we were up to close to that prior to the whole masking/vaccination thing and it was more about a failure in our medical system for decades leading up to it. An overwhelming poor response by an Administration that did not care nor have any plans to handle a pandemic let alone much of anything. But getting hysterical over my comment once again validates my belief that we have two camps in operation at the moment – the FEARFUL and the GRIEVING. As they overlap on the Venn Diagram to include rage, anger, and depression they enable many to delve into their own despairs and look for ways to absolve or relieve it. And we have crazy assaults, shootings, suicides, drugs and other behaviors that have led us to where we are and once again turning to law and law enforcement to fix it. Yeah that has worked out well hasn’t it? We don’t hold any of them accountable on a daily basis nor find those will do so. We just clutch pearls, have thoughts, have prayers and then worry about if we have to go back to the office or if someone has covid. Fuck you.

Own your fucking evil. Own it and then do something. Organize a march, write every motherfucker in Congress, do something. In the two years since George Floyd died did anything change? No, so clearly you are not doing enough. Do more. I have said I was out in the Reproductive Rights, the BLM movement and Asian Hate as I suspected what came to fruition, FUCK ALL NOTHING. But this is one I do have so I am going to start by asking hard questions of anyone and everyone. What the fuck are you doing? I already know the answer. FUCK ALL NOTHING.

The article below I reprint as the Author is right. We are all responsible. All of us.

Hyman Rickover once said that “In our system of society, no authority exists to tell us what is good and desirable. We are each free to seek what we think is good in our own way. The danger is that where men compromise truth and let decency slip, they eventually end up with neither. A free society can survive only through men and women of integrity.”

Opinion You. This is your fault.

By Christine Emba Columnist |

May 26, 2022 The Washington Post

On Tuesday, a gunman targeted a fourth-grade classroom at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., killing 21 people, 19 of them children. On May 14, a gunman shot and killed 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. On April 12, a gunman shot 10 people in a Brooklyn, N.Y. subway station. We’re 145 days into the year and there have already been 213 mass shootings in the United States.

The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Follow Christine Emba’s opinionsFollow

Wrong. The problem is you.

Way back in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was castigated for saying that some Americans “cling to guns,” and for suggesting that this was unreasonable or unhealthy. The evidence — which is to say the pileup of bodies year after year — suggests he was correct.

But other politicians, seeing the backlash, learned what not to say. They learned not to point fingers, because they knew that they, too, would be accused of hating freedom, loving tyranny, overreaching in pursuit of control. They understood that they would be shouted down and then perhaps voted out.

They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.

You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.

You, the “shooting hobbyist” or “gun enthusiast” who advocates against gun control because you think anything that makes your weekend amusement even the slightest bit more difficult to participate in is not to be borne.

https://450d7b359a59909fd40bea900334b4ad.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

You, the pundit who sneers that your opponents “don’t want a solution” and then refuses to provide your own, preferring to use a tragedy to build your brand.

You, who would rather forget about the children murdered and the families broken, because if we thought about them too much you’d feel bad and might have to give something up.

Lest I be accused of being one-sided, let’s not stop the finger-pointing there. If it’s a “you” problem, it’s an “us” problem, too — the United States and its culture writ large, right and left included.

A country that defines itself by its freedom — and has, over decades, fetishized a misguided ideal of “liberty” that values the individual over everyone and everything else.

A country that touts its dynamism yet dithers, its leaders wringing their hands and offering empty platitudes — “we have to find solutions,” “we must take action” — as if the solutions aren’t obvious, as if the actions one could take haven’t been modeled for us by other countries for decades.

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

It’s easy to find excuses for why this keeps happening. We’ve done it for decades. But the comforting fictions have worn thin, to the point of transparency.

It’s time to stop feigning helplessness. To stop pretending we are the ones under attack. To stop gaslighting the real victims, who have already suffered tragedy enough.

It’s time to admit that we — we Americans, and the rationalizations we tolerate — are to blame. Only then can we shoulder the responsibility to act.

Look, Just Look

And I mean here, right now. Another, yet another mass shooting in a school. This one is different as this is a Child of Color who went to his school to do harm. It is rare as only a couple of shooters I am recalling right now were. The one I do was in Marysville where the shooter and victims were Native Americans. So these kind of shooting are outliers in most of them, so again the right wing fuckwits will go “See those Immigrants!! Uh no fuckers, no. The only parallel was the decline in mental health, lack of available help and of course the big one – ACCESS TO GUNS. As we seem to believe, this was his act of revenge and his act of hate towards those he felt wronged him. Of course NONE of the victims were the actual ones who wronged him but fuck that shit. He has a gun and he is going do what needs to be done.

The same right to life fuckwits who are sure that all beings fertilized in utero that are not theirs have a right to life and with that the responsibility ends there. Education, health care, family leave, decent affordable housing and decent wages, well like the gunman, fuck that shit. Give the man and gun and he will go a shooting, isnt’ that the Biblical verse? Fuck that shit too.

Read, look and remember… well for the next 48 hours as either you will move onto the next or there will be another shooting. And remember, no, not thoughts and prayers; fuck that shit.

What we know about the victims of the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas

By Moriah Balingit, Beth Reinhard, María Luisa Paúl, Holly Bailey, and Karina Elwood

May 25, 2022 The Washington Post

A veteran educator whose dedication to a student with Down syndrome left a lasting impression. A jubilant 10-year-old whose dancing and joking lit up his family’s home. A fourth grader who had just made the honor roll.

The names of those slain by a gunman at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Tex., on Tuesday — including at least 19 children and two teachers — were only beginning to emerge in the hours afterward, as the grief-stricken community of 16,000 about 80 miles west of San Antonio tried to process what happened. Just days before summer vacation, an 18-year-old opened fire in a classroom, unleashing carnage not seen at a U.S. school in nearly a decade.

Here is what we know so far about the victims of the attack.

Eva Mireles, 44

Eva Mireles. (Courtesy of Lydia Martinez Delgado)

Mireles, an educator for 17 years, taught fourth graders at Robb Elementary School, according to her aunt, Lydia Martinez Delgado, who confirmed her niece was among those slain. Delgado said her nephew, Ruben Ruiz, was a police officer with the Uvalde school district and was married to Mireles. The couple’s daughter recently graduated from college, Delgado said.

Delgado said Mireles was cheerful and active, and recalled a time she got up before sunrise with other relatives for a hike during a family gathering. “She did all she could to live a long life, and here it was cut short,” Delgado said in a phone interview early Wednesday.

Audrey Garcia said she will never forget the attention Mireles paid to her daughter Gabby, now 23, when she was in third grade.

“My daughter has Down syndrome, and she was one of the first students at that time to be included in a regular classroom,” said Garcia, who now lives in San Antonio. “Ms. Mireles always went above and beyond. She never saw Gabby as having less potential than any of the other students.”

On Tuesday, Garcia posted a photo on Twitter of her daughter and Mireles that she said demonstrated the teacher’s dedication. Garcia said she last heard from Mireles about two years ago, after a local television station did a story on her daughter’s graduation from high school and her new jewelry business. Mireles would often reach out around Christmas, Garcia said, because Gabby had given her an ornament as a gift.

“She would say that she always thought about Gabby when she put up her Christmas tree,” Garcia said. “After all those years, she still cared about Gabby as a student. I just want everyone to know what kind of person she was and what kind of educator she was. I don’t want her to be forgotten.”

— Moriah Balingit and Beth Reinhard

Xavier Lopez, 10

Xavier Lopez. (Courtesy of Felicha Martinez)

The Lopez household was teeming with children’s laughter and music — and its source, more often than not, was 10-year-old Xavier cracking a joke or dancing cumbia.

But the giggles and grooving sounds that once filled the air were replaced Tuesday by the pain of a life cut short, Xavier’s family said. The fourth grader at Robb Elementary School was among those slain during Tuesday’s shooting rampage, his mother, Felicha Martinez, told The Washington Post.

“He was funny, never serious and his smile,” Martinez said, her voice breaking. “That smile I will never forget. It would always cheer anyone up.”

Xavier “was so full of life,” she said, and a bright light for the family. Never one to shy away from the camera, he would sway his hips, wave his arms and energetically dance in the house with his brothers — moments of glee that Martinez readily captured on her TikTok account.

In school, Xavier had a penchant for sports — favoring soccer and baseball — but also a great interest in art, his favorite subject, Martinez said.

“He loved any activity in which he could be creative and especially get to draw,” Martinez said.

Just a few days shy of completing his last year of elementary school, Xavier was counting the days until he would officially move up the academic ladder into Flores Middle School in Uvalde. “He really couldn’t wait to go to middle school,” his mother said.

His dreams seemed so close on Tuesday at Robb Elementary School’s honor roll ceremony. Martinez was there to cheer him on as Xavier’s name was called to receive his certificate.

Mere hours before the tragedy, Martinez snapped a photo of Xavier. She told him she was proud and that she loved him, before hugging him goodbye. She said she did not imagine that would be the last moment she would share with her “mama’s boy.”

— María Luisa Paúl

Jose Flores, 10

Jose Flores. (Courtesy of Christopher Salazar)

Jose, 10, was a fourth grader at Robb Elementary School who loved to play baseball, according to his uncle Christopher Salazar, who confirmed his nephew’s death.

“He was a very happy little boy. He loved both his parents … and loved to laugh and have fun,” Salazar said.

He said his nephew, who had two brothers and a sister, “loved going to school.” On Tuesday, hours before the shooting, Jose had received an award for making the honor roll.

“He was very smart,” Salazar said. “He wasn’t a kid who would look for trouble.”

— Karina Elwood

Gun it

Yesterday in a conversation with a walking idiot, which I had promised myself I would do my best to avoid, but I always think that maybe it would be different, it wasn’t but I carried on. And as I tried to have him explain to me the fetish lifestyle of Instagram where people pose either semi naked, with guns, with animals, with friends, with food and always about their best life I wondered how and why they think anyone cares and more importantly how are they paying for all this living when it seems to be doing anything but learning and growing as a person. If anything Instagram does is provide a freeze frame of a moment when you are doing your least, not your best at being a better person.

And that pretty much sums up social media in general. You go shout to the trees and they fall and no one hears a sound, you go to Facebook and join the group that is most like you and then you ride that bubbleator to the top and back down again with no one getting into share the ride unless they are just like you. Tik Tok is the new in thing where you go out of your way to share a calculated and well rehearsed moment of supposed independent freestyle. Really? You do?

Sorry but when I see adults posing in these bizarre narcissistic videos and photos in places with people and their children what is the lesson here? We can all be famous for 15 minutes, we are the most special, the bestest, the brightest and the coolest. You also are full of bullshit as my Father would say if he saw this, “They haven’t got a pot to piss in so this is all bullshit.” It is up there with people wearing label after label as if to say “I’m RICH BITCH” no you are in debt bitch.

And this is where gun nuts come in with their crazy need to have every single weapon known to mankind. The explanations veer on excuses and of course are like billionaires when asked, “Why do you need so much money.” They immediately go on the defensive as if to say they do good things with it, building businesses in which to hire more people. Sure then why don’t ‘they pay them better wages, pay more taxes to have better schools for said people’s children and enable the cities they live in to have better infrastructure in which to provide roads, housing and other essentials that lend all to have a better quality of life. Since the pandemic began check you utility bill and see how that 24/7/365 thing is working out there.

Nearly every major city now has a large portion of residents paying well over their take home in rental costs. There is a major eviction stream coming down the pike and I suspect a large commercial sector of developers facing serious debt issues as the exodus from major cities will change that need for “luxury” multi family housing projects that were the biggest contributor to cities bottom line. When left empty there is little more to say about those tax incentives to pay for services that have no income revenue.

We tax cigarettes, liquor, food and gas. We have a sales tax on every single aspect of living. Some states, like Washington and Tennessee where I lived, have a regressive tax system that disproportionately affects poorer residents with a high sales tax that adds to the costs of goods and services. At one point both Seattle and Nashville attempted to tax Yoga studios and gyms as a way of generating revenue. The irony is that they had to drop that after realizing how that nearly killed these small businesses and the one industry that now has found even larger chains struggling thanks to the pandemic. Desperate times, desperate measures.

So why not guns? Why not tax, license, require insurance, and of course tax the ammo one needs to fuel said guns in the same way gas fuels cars. Have mandatory background checks, a waiting period before one can pick up a gun proving that they have taken a safety class and lesson on how to manage and care for guns, issues about loaning or selling a gun without a license, just like you do car. And said license must be updated annually along with mandatory insurance to protect those who may get injured from handling a gun the same way we tax liquor and cigarettes. Gosh that would be a stream of revenue.

14 people died in a week, over 43,000 die annually at the end of gun. And with that an average of 100 deaths per day. And yes the largest portion is from suicides, 24,000, annually. The United States is the only nation on the planet where there are more guns in civilian hands than there are civilians, according to the authoritative global Small Arms Survey, conducted by the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. As of the most recent report, in 2018, we had about 120 privately owned guns per 100 citizens. The nation in second place, with about 53 guns in private hands per 100 people, was Yemen — which at least had its raging civil war as an explanation.

France and Germany, by contrast, both had around 20 firearms in private hands for every 100 citizens. Japan had fewer than one privately owned gun for every 100 people, and gun deaths there are exceedingly rare.

So the American persona seems to believe that gun ownership is a statement and reflection of being a Patriot. The same folks who advocate the right of said ownership via the Constitution don’t understand the same document and how it works, how it is amended and altered to reflect changes in times and beliefs. They hold one truth – their own. This is the Instagram set of mentality.

So as I concluded my one sided conversation, the only ones I have had the past year, I thought that while there are many on both sides of the fence regarding guns they too have one sided conversations as it makes it easier. It is by far harder to talk to someone you don’t agree with, let alone are not as dumb or as smart as you. Either/or it is an endless challenge that tests patience and sanity. And we have a problem with those as well. It is rage and a lack of ability to be patient, to delay gratification and in turn a lot of mental health issues that are decimating communities during the pandemic that have contributed to the rising tide of violence across the country. We have a massive failure to communicate that much is clear.

Shoot! No really Shoot!

Well as Nashville and the rest of Tennessee hit by the Tornado continues to clean up the wonderful Legislature and their Governor/Plumber are moving through more idiotic laws that will do more harm than good.

Over objections from law enforcement officials, Tennessee lawmakers moved forward with Gov. Bill Lee’s controversial proposal to allow residents to carry guns without obtaining a permit. 

With a 7-2 vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill, which would allow for both open and concealed carrying of handguns for Tennesseans 21 years old and older. 

Minutes after the Senate’s actions, a House committee similarly considered the bill, hearing from a few speakers, but delayed a vote.

The measure contains a provision that would extend the right to military members who are 18- to 20-years-old.  

Tennesseans who legally want to buy a handgun would still have to pass the federal background check, although there are some loopholes to the requirement. 

The committee’s approval signals the measure’s passage could be significantly easier than in the past. In 2016, the committee narrowly rejected a similar proposal.  As the judiciary committee considered the measure Tuesday, proponents and opponents were in the audience, with some providing testimony during an hour-long discussion.  

Advocates of the legislation, including the governor and legislative leadership, say the proposal will make Tennessee safer because it includes increased penalties for those who obtain or use weapons illegally.  
But critics, which have included some prosecutors and law enforcement officials, raised their own safety concerns, noting the legislation eliminates the requirement for gun owners to undergo training. 
Maggi Duncan, executive director of the Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police, said Tuesday the bill creates worries over officer and resident safety.  
Duncan noted the new proposal would also end the state’s ability to deny those seeking to obtain a permit due to a host of disqualifying reasons. She said last year alone, the state had 53,000 permit request denials due mental defects. 
Jeff Hughes, chief of Brentwood’s police department, said, “I’m personally concerned about my officers on the street.” 
Shaundelle Brooke, the mother of Akilah DaSilva, who was killed in the 2018 Waffle House shooting, said the permitless carry legislation would allow others “disturbed” individuals, like Travis Reinking, to carry weapons in public. 
Matt Herriman, a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association, made a host of arguments, including saying people prohibited from buying a firearm would still not be allowed. He did not elaborate on the claim.
Herriman further argued the legislation would put legal gun owners on equal footing with criminals who are carrying weapons illegally.
No one from the governor’s office spoke on behalf of the legislation.  
The committee’s approval comes less than a week after a mass shooting in Milwaukee left six people dead. It now heads to the Senate finance committee. 

When the House Constitutional Protections and Sentencing Subcommittee took up the measure Tuesday afternoon, the panel opted to delay voting on it for at least another week.  

Now just for one moment think about that one.  Okay done.  Really? This is insane and again another tick on the barometer of crazy that defines Tennessee.  The tornado was one sign that I am glad I am gone but imagine with pistol packing mamas hyped up over the looters, the kids who already have guns stolen from all the cars they break into or carjack and in turn shoot and kill anyone who says no, sounds great.  Sounds really really great.   Guns are confiscated from children almost daily from the Nashville public schools with the students saying that they have it for protection so now at least they will be able to validate that because everyone will need a gun to protect themselves.  This is from a Google search Nashville School Confiscates gun.  A lot there to process and I walked into those dumpsters daily always afraid and with good reason.  Really think that is normal for a 4th grader to possess a gun? A 10th grader?  And gosh even good old white Iowa home of the caucus has issues.  Good to know so much for these bible carrying, christian value states and sanity.  Now true we have a problem but what I find is the moral superiority and finger pointing to those who do not share the same convoluted bullshit values as the problem. Guess not!

So lets just review the mass shootings of the past few days/weeks/months/years:   Oh fuck it here is a link to Vox who analyzed the problem of mass shootings. And again remember this is what is defined as more than 4 dead at a time.  So we have many many more with fewer numbers so I can see this Tennessee thing working out super super great.  And here we are just entering month three of the year  and so far we have had 62 people killed, 184 wounded in 47 mass shootings.  And this from CBS News: There were more mass shootings than days in 2019.   And California in 2019 had three mass shootings in a under a week, that will get rid of those liberals!  And Chicago had this last weekend 26 shot some accidental some not.  Again blame “The Blacks.”

The word “safe” which is used so voraciously and in every scenario is in and of itself a safe word.  I have never heard it here ever to my knowledge and yet we have some serious shit in the tri state area but again people here make the presumption (not assumption as that is well more of a Southern thing)  that you live here you know the risks.  Shit the Subways have never been cleaner and that is a low bar but that is something.

And this is what it is all about in Tennessee black people. The end.  All the laws from Voter Suppression to Anti LGBQT ones is to ensure that the powers that be spread the hate across the spectrum of marginalized communities to make it look less like racial bias and prejudice to just overall bullshit and overall hate for anyone not White, not Male, not Christian and not married to a Christian in a conventional church marriage where it excuses the men for abusing wives and children, while excusing their sexual depravity.  Three years of living there and when the tornado actually brought out the best in the community that says something.

But again this is a state against sanctuary cities for Immigrants seeking refuge but gun carriers, not a problem!

Why are Northeast Tennessee counties declaring themselves ‘Second Amendment Sanctuaries’?
Jonathan Roberts • Jan 29, 2020 at 7:48 PM
jroberts@johnsoncitypress.com

East Tennessee has, in essence, declared itself a “Second Amendment sanctuary” region.

Since June, all 12 counties in Tennessee’s First Congressional District have passed variations of “Second Amendment sanctuary” resolutions, in addition to roughly a dozen other counties across the state. More than 40 others are working on passing their own measures, which seek to prevent the passage and implementation of new gun legislation.

But why, in a state with a Republican supermajority in its legislature and a Republican governor at the helm, are counties rushing to protect themselves from what they see as an infringement of their Second Amendment rights? It stems from a bill introduced in the Tennessee General Assembly in February which would authorize the use of extreme risk protection orders, a bill commonly known as a ‘’red flag law.’’

“The real reason for (passing the resolution) was that we want our state legislators — and everyone in Nashville — to hear us in East Tennessee and know that we don’t want our Second Amendment rights infringed on,” said Sullivan County Commissioner Gary Stidham, who sponsored his county’s resolution. “While a lot of people have a lot of good reasoning behind these extreme risk protection orders, we just had a very strong — and I had a very strong — feeling that this is chipping away at our Second Amendment rights.

“We just had to be very cautious because once you start losing those rights, it’s very hard to pull those back in.”

Kent Harris, the commissioner who sponsored Washington County’s resolution, also pointed to red flag laws as the driving force behind his resolution, calling it “a slippery slope.”

“Nobody’s saying that we don’t need to follow what laws we do have, but some of these new ones, (red flag laws) being one of them — the only people those laws are going to affect are people like myself that are law-abiding citizens,” Harris said.

In Johnson County, the resolution that was passed specifically calls on state Rep. Timothy Hill, R-Blountville, and state Sen. Jon Lundberg, R-Bristol, to oppose two previous iterations of a red flag law, which was sent to a committee in February.

What are extreme risk protection orders?

Generally speaking, extreme risk protection orders would allow a judge to temporarily remove a gun or guns from someone who shows an immediate risk of harming themselves or others.

Last week, a pair of Tennessee lawmakers introduced a version of the bill that would allow any family member, household member, intimate partner or law enforcement officer to file a petition for emergency protection against somebody believed to be a risk.

“We absolutely support red flag laws,” said Jessica Joyner of the Tri-Cities Moms Demand Action chapter. “A red flag law is an extreme risk protection order and so many people don’t break that down,” Joyner said. “It’s just giving law enforcement the ability to assist families in the removal of weapons while due process occurs.”

Under the proposed House bill (HB1873), sponsored by state Rep. Gloria Johnson, D-Knoxville, the petitioner would have to sign a sworn affidavit, which would then be heard by a judge. Should a judge grant the emergency protection order, the person in question would be barred from purchasing or possessing a firearm for the duration of the order, which will be revisited after 30 days and may not last more than one year. The Senate version of the bill (SB1807), which is sponsored by state Sen. Sara Kyle, D-Memphis, has similar language.

“It’s put on law enforcement — this isn’t your neighbor coming and taking your guns and being the law,” Joyner said, pushing back on a frequent talking point of critics. “We would love to see our representatives sponsoring some of those laws.”

What do lawmakers say about red flag laws?

While red flag laws have some bipartisan support in Tennessee, Tri-Cities lawmakers are not in favor of them.

In separate statements to the Press, state Sens. Rusty Crowe, R-Johnson City, and Lundberg joined their colleges in the state House in voicing opposition to the proposed bills, with all saying they believe the bills violate a person’s due process rights.

Crowe called the legislation “an unconstitutional Trojan Horse to open the door to comprehensive firearm registration and confiscation,” while Rep. Matthew Hill, R-Jonesborough, said that he is against “any legislation that limits the God-given constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms,” but that he will “continue to focus on improving safety while preserving our Second Amendment rights.”

In a Facebook Live video posted on Monday, Timothy Hill, R-Blountville, also voiced opposition to the proposed bills, and said he will “stand in support for the Second Amendment” and expand those rights every chance he gets.

Rep. Micah Van Huss, R-Jonesborough, said the Second Amendment “makes all states sanctuaries from federal infringement on citizens’ right to keep and bear arms.”

What effect will the sanctuary resolutions have?

Legally, the resolutions do not change any local laws or how laws are enforced — even the resolutions that go beyond simply affirming its residents’ Second Amendment rights have no legal recourse for enforcement.

“What I think is interesting is this is sort of uncharted territory,” said Colin Glennon, a political scientist and pre-law adviser at East Tennessee State University. “Most states, Tennessee and Virginia included, have some sort of the language which says local municipalities can pass laws and things, but, overwhelmingly, state law takes precedent.

“One of things that’s an interesting point that some critics make of these (resolutions) is that, mostly, they’re meaningless, and if that was the end of it, they’d be harmless,” Glennon said, “but the actual harm is that it causes confusion for residents, who become unaware of what state laws mean.”

For the most part, the East Tennessee counties that have passed sanctuary resolutions have passed ones that do little more than formally state their opposition to new gun legislation. Some counties, however, go a step further and explicitly state they will not use public funds for the enforcement of any new gun laws. In East Tennessee, two counties — Jefferson and Unicoi — have added such language. Harris said that he would have liked to add similar language to Washington County’s resolution, and that he may attempt to pass an updated resolution in the future.

“It’s not legally binding, we all know that,” said Unicoi County Commissioner Todd Wilcox, who wrote the county’s resolution stating that public funds won’t be used for the enforcement of new gun laws. “We’ll see what happens with that if it even comes to that, but I’m sure what would happen — if I had to guess — I’m sure the county attorney would say it’s not legally binding, so we would have no ground to stand on withholding funding.”

Wilcox said that the funding measure was added to show the seriousness of their opposition, and not to be utilized as an actual legal measure. Representatives from Jefferson County could not be reached for comment.

U.S. Rep. Phil Roe, R-1st, also voiced support for the counties passing resolutions, saying he “understand(s) why counties are pushing back against what they see as a threat to their constitutionally-guaranteed rights.”

“If it’s OK for local governments to not enforce our immigration laws, it’s hard for me to see why Second Amendment sanctuary laws wouldn’t be OK,” Roe said. “I will continue to strongly defend the Second Amendment, and hope that attempts to unnecessarily limit this right are defeated.”

Despite the lack of legal authority, Glennon sees the resolutions as being a useful way to make a strong, countywide statement.

“I do think, to be fair, if we ask, ‘is there value’ — even if they are meaningless — and it’s just making a statement, then sure, there’s value in that and it’s a strong declaration, so there can still be value there even if, legally speaking, they may not mean that much,” Glennon said.

I am out.. in more ways than one.  So now I am going to abstain and pray the coronation virus away!