Memphis Blues

Tennessee has many problems and the largest is issues that are about poverty and race. Memphis is largely populated by Black Americans and with that they are a larger sector of poorer ones and the city is often decried for their crime and violence that has nothing and everything to do with Race. As when there is increased poverty there is increased crime and that overlap comes to define the City of Memphis. But you also realize that it is a city of Soul in every sense of the word. There are working class jobs and a strong presence of many factors that are often ignored when discussing Memphis and its place in history. But the crime issue and the now closed down Scorpion Unit of the Police which brought that negative magnifying glass down to examine once again the city and with it the revolving door of crime and policing. There are many better writers who have written on this very subject, Radley Balko, who lives in Nashville is perhaps the most significant of ones who have written about Police and Prosecutorial Misconduct, Judicial Bias and the issues of penalties and laws that are most damaging to those people of color and the poor. The largest tool in the arsenal is Civil Asset Forfeiture. This is where any cash or personal property is seized by the Police as it is believed gained from a criminal venture, all done even prior to conviction or a determination of guilt. It is ripe with abuse and exploitation and here is an excellent explanation on how that occurs, but also below is an article about Memphis and the endless cycle of pain it inflects on the residents and once again those of Color.

But what is also essential to note that none of the profiled individuals had drugs or guns in their vehicles which is often a suspicion or reason for stop and search and an explanation for why the Police were afraid and aggressive. So once again myths debunked. America is a violent nation and the Police are large contributors to that.

In Memphis, Car Seizures Are a Lucrative and Punishing Police Tactic

Vehicle seizures have been used to combat street racing and other crimes, but critics say that even people not convicted of a crime have been left for months without their cars.

The New York Times

By Jessica Jaglois and Mike Baker

  • March 23, 2023

MEMPHIS — As he drove to work on a summer afternoon in Memphis last year, Ralph Jones saw a woman on the sidewalk flagging him down. Thinking she was in distress or needed a ride, Mr. Jones said, he pulled over.

After a brief conversation in which she tried to lure him to a nearby motel, Mr. Jones said, he drove away but was soon stopped by the police and yanked from his truck. The 70-year-old welder said that with just 86 cents in his pocket, he had neither the intent nor the money to solicit a prostitute, as the officers were claiming.

His protests were to no avail. Mr. Jones was cited, and his truck, along with the expensive tools inside, was seized. The charges were eventually dropped, but the truck and his work equipment remained corralled in a city impound lot for six weeks, when prosecutors finally agreed to return it in exchange for a $750 payment.

“It’s nothing but a racket,” Mr. Jones said.

Police departments around the country have long used asset forfeiture laws to seize property believed to be associated with criminal activity, a tactic intended to deprive lawbreakers of ill-gotten gains, deter future crimes and, along the way, provide a lucrative revenue source for police departments.

But it became a favored law-enforcement tactic in Memphis, where the elite street crime unit involved in the death of Tyre Nichols on Jan. 7, known as the Scorpion unit, was among several law enforcement teams in the city making widespread use of vehicle seizures.

Like Mr. Jones, some of the people affected by the seizures had not been convicted of any crime, and defense lawyers said they disproportionately affected low-income residents, and people of color.

Over the past decade, civil rights advocates in several states have successfully pushed to make it harder for the police to seize property, but Tennessee continues to have some of the most aggressive seizure laws in the country.

While some states now require a criminal conviction before forfeiting property, Tennessee’s process can be much looser, requiring only that the government show, in a civil process, that the property was more likely than not to have been connected to certain types of criminal activity — a less rigorous burden of proof. Tennessee allows local law enforcement agencies to keep the bulk of the proceeds of the assets they seize.

And the process for getting property back in the state can be prohibitive for those who have little money or the ability to hire a lawyer: Those who fail to file a claim and post a $350 bond within 30 days automatically forfeit their property.

“Tennessee’s forfeiture laws are among the nation’s worst,” said Lisa Knepper, a senior director of strategic research at the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit law firm that has called for changes in state and federal forfeiture laws.

In Memphis, some of the more than 700 vehicles seized last year were taken from people who were ultimately found guilty of serious criminal charges. But other residents reported in interviews that they were compelled to pay large fees to recover their vehicles even when they had not been convicted of any crime.

In 2021, the Memphis Police Chief, Cerelyn Davis, came forward with the city’s plan to combat growing incidents of reckless driving and drag racing with vehicle seizures. This happened at around the same time that the city was launching the Scorpion unit — an acronym for the department’s Street Crimes Operation to Restore Peace in Our Neighborhoods.

No longer would police officers be merely issuing citations to reckless drivers who endangered others, she said, seeming to acknowledge that such seizures might not ultimately stand up in court.

“When we identify individuals that are reckless driving to a point where they put other lives in danger, we want to take your car, too,” she said. “Take the car. Even if the case gets dropped in court. We witnessed it. You did it. You might be inconvenienced for three days without your car. That’s enough.”

Mayor Jim Strickland was also a strong supporter of the seizure policy and even proposed destroying cars used by drag racers and other reckless drivers. “I don’t care if they serve a day in jail,” he said last year. “Let me get their cars, and then once a month we’ll line them all up, maybe at the old fairgrounds, Liberty Park, and just smash them.”

Police officers said it was on suspicion of reckless driving that they first pulled over Mr. Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man who died after a long and brutal beating by Scorpion officers. Five officers have been charged with murder in the case. Chief Davis subsequently said that she had seen nothing to support the reckless driving allegation. Nichols’s car was taken to the city’s impound lot.

The Scorpion unit was touted for its record of seizing drugs, cash and cars. In just the first few months of its operations, the city reported that the elite unit had seized some 270 vehicles.

Many of the vehicle seizures have revolved around drugs. In those instances, according to several defense lawyers, the agency often seized a vehicle based on a claim that it was being used in a drug-dealing operation — a common basis for such seizures in many cities, intended to deprive drug dealers of their profits and the ability to continue their work.

But even some of those not convicted of a crime said they spent weeks without a car while trying to navigate a complicated court process.

Filing a claim in court requires posting a $350 bond. Sometimes, defense lawyers said, the authorities managing the case may offer to release the car without requiring a court hearing if a person pays a fee that can amount to thousands of dollars.

Shawn Douglas Jr. lost his car in the fall after being stopped at a Memphis gas station by officers who reported finding two clear baggies containing marijuana inside a backpack.

Mr. Douglas was soon in handcuffs, arrested on suspicion of a felony drug infraction, an allegation he denied. His car was sent to impound.

In an interview, Mr. Douglas said one of the arresting officers commented to him about his 2015 Dodge Charger: “He said, ‘That would be a great police vehicle. When we take those vehicles we hope people don’t come get them back so we can do drug busts out of them.’”

Months later, Mr. Douglas’s criminal charges had been dropped, but his car was still in police custody. He was only able to recover it after paying $925, records show; crews towed it out to a dusty lot and handed it over to him, its battery dead. Mr. Douglas had to struggle with battery cables to get it started.

“It cost a lot of money,” Mr. Douglas said. “It puts you back on everything and creates more stress. When you can’t pay bills, you can’t do anything.”

Neither the police department nor the district attorney’s office responded to questions about the forfeiture cases of Mr. Douglas and others interviewed for this article, and they only briefly addressed the city’s forfeiture policy.

In Memphis, as in many cities, revenues from such impound and forfeiture fees are returned to support policing activities, becoming a regular source of revenue.

Memphis has not disclosed how much money it generated for the hundreds of vehicles that were forfeited. The city did report seizing some $1.7 million in cash last year, winning forfeiture of nearly $1.3 million.

This income is most often being generated from the city’s poorest residents, defense lawyers said.

“It’s unfair to a lot of the poorer citizens in Memphis,” said Arthur Horne, who has represented such clients. “It’s a huge tax.”

Vehicle seizures have never been a priority in the city’s overall crime-fighting strategy, Chief Davis said in a brief interview, adding that any money gained from forfeitures was not essential to police operations.

“We haven’t put a high level of priority on asset forfeiture here in Memphis,” she said. “We put more of a priority on violent crime, reducing violent crime.”

“It’s not like we’re out trying to seize vehicles. We have a budget to support the police department.”

Erica R. Williams, the communications director for the Shelby County District Attorney’s Office, says that prosecutors do not receive any share in proceeds from vehicle forfeitures.

“We attempt to handle these cases as quickly as possible in an effort to minimize the difficulty caused by the seizure of a vehicle, while simultaneously seeking to accomplish the spirit of the statute,” she said, which was to “discourage engagement in future offenses.”

Seven states do not give forfeiture revenues to law enforcement. A few states, such as New Mexico, Maine and North Carolina, do not permit civil proceedings and allow forfeiture only after criminal convictions.

A bill pending in Congress proposes a series of new rules that would raise the standards for the government to win forfeiture, give access to lawyers for people trying to recover their property and end profit incentives by sending revenues to the Treasury Department’s general fund.

John Flynn, the president of the National District Attorneys Association, said efforts seeking to limit forfeitures have at times brought together lawmakers on the left and the libertarian right. But he said such efforts could go too far, undermining a law-enforcement tool that he said provides a deterrent to wrongdoers and turns over illegal criminal profits to those trying to fight crime.

“From a prosecutor’s standpoint, any money or vehicles or property gained through illegal conduct should be forfeited,” Mr. Flynn said.

He said safeguards allowed people to present evidence that their property was not acquired through illegal means.

In Memphis, at the city’s crowded impound lot north of town, cars towed in from around the city for various reasons mix with recovered stolen vehicles and cars seized by the police. Tow trucks buzz in regularly, and a fine coat of dust from a nearby limestone supply company settles over everything.

A dozen shoppers were on hand one recent morning looking at a GMC Denali that was up for auction. It looked to be in mint condition on the passenger side, but 20 or so bullet holes dotted the driver’s side door.

Further down the lot, Kyle Lyons was standing next to a pile of belongings that he had retrieved from his 2010 BMW, which had been seized in July by police officers who said they had found heroin in the vehicle. Mr. Lyons, who said he had struggled with addiction, was hoping to get back thousands of dollars worth of Craftsman tools that had been taken along with the car — equipment he needed to work.

Once his car was gone, he said, he had lost nearly everything else.

“Everything I use to make money with was gone,” Mr. Lyons said. “I couldn’t work, couldn’t go out and buy no more. I was homeless for four months.”

He has left Memphis and moved home to Kentucky. His car is still impounded.

Justice Served Cold

Nothing can change the fact that George Floyd is still very dead, dead on the street with a Police Officer’s knee pressed against his throat, but from that moment where the living stood and watched the dying, they did not fail him, they testified in every sense of the word. I cannot stress enough that it was 17 year old girl who did not waiver and did not move and took the film that shook the world and yesterday the verdict shook those who waited to the core. And there were two sides to this Jury, those who believed in Chauvin’s innocence and those who watched that image and could think anything but the contrary. Mr. Floyd’s last words were Mama, and with that he fell into a place where one hopes he is with her in the place one goes when one passes from the earth. I don’t believe in heaven and hell but I do believe that we are a collective of souls that create the universe of energy that makes all of us whole.

With that verdict on all three counts, I will admit surprised me as I was sure the murder one would not take, but then again who doesn’t love surprises! And let the appeals begin and undoubtedly all will be challenged but that one will be the one most likely tossed. I don’t think Chauvin “intended” to murder Mr. Floyd but that day, that moment in time, it was just that – murder.

To die at the hand of cop, be that from a “taser”, a gun, a projectile, a baton, a push, a neck, an arm, a beat down or just by one’s own hand as you are so exhausted you choose to simply give up we know that Police in this country are not here to protect and serve anyone but their own. The Blue Wall cracked somewhat during this trial but as anyone who has traveled down these roads in America our infrastructure is one hot mess and our roads have been well traveled and will need a lot of stimulus in which to repair and rebuild. Police reform is one that will take more than a bulldozer. And how do we know this? Well we are at 3 deaths a day since Mr. Floyd died. We have numerous other stories of Police misconduct that did not end in death such as the Military Officer in Virginia who was not blinded by the light but by the pepper spray over a fucking license plate. We have the “Karen” a 73 year old woman whose arm was broken over a $14 dollar incident at a Walmart and held in a cell for 6 hours before taken to the hospital. We have the Rochester 9 year old pepper sprayed and cuffed; a 5 year old cuffed and berated by Police for being well 5; Or the zip ties to restrain a 6 year old. Was she at the Capitol March?

And only moments prior to the verdict an Ohio teen was killed by Police.

I read this story today and his story is like many:

A security guard saw that Stephen Vest was injured. The dark-haired 30-year-old’s left arm appeared to be bleeding as he walked out of the park just before 8pm on a warm night last October.

“What’s wrong? What happened? What can I do to help?” the guard asked Vest from his car.

Stephen Vest was in distress. In the next 10 minutes, he would allegedly pull out a knife and try to stab the guard. Vest was Tased and jumped on the back of a motorbike stopped at a traffic light. He would ask a truck driver to kill him, and pursue men through a pet store.

Just outside the store, local police were waiting. They too attempted to Tase Vest. And then they fired their guns at him 11 times.

So, once again the story ends as they all do, a person in distress DEAD. How is it that a man survived the Paradise wild fires only to end up dead by the Police as again what were they going to do? Well kill him.

We have no way of generating the change needed across the country to stop the tide of Police violence towards Americans who once they are in the eye range or should I say target range of those assigned to protect and serve, there will be little of that going on. This is been ongoing for DECADES. There are no bad apples, there is a bad tree and that needs to be cut down. Sorry but Mr. Rogers Officer Friendly was a fictitious character. And he is likely if not dead is well retired from the force. I want to point out the word force and I want to remind myself that many of the insurrectionist/seditionists were members of our Military and Police/Sheriff departments? Proud Boys? Really are your Mothers proud? Just call yourself what you are Angry White Boys. And do I hate White Men? Well kinda sorta yeah. But their fuck buddies, the White Sisters are not anything I am too keen on either. I must have been dropped on my head as a baby. But in all honesty, I like and dislike people on the color of their soul. And that is like the color of their skin but I see it and that is not the same as that what is within is something more fluid and more than the sum of their extrinsic parts. You can see that if you choose and if you choose not you don’t. And that is how Police sees you, sees me, sees us. They make the call the minute they see you. And based on any number of factors that have little to do with you, they, the Police, make the call to kill, beat, handcuff, taser or let you walk away. In one minute they hold the power of your life in their hands. They are God. They are Justice and they Exterminator. They will make that call and they can walk away and wipe their hands of it all. And yesterday on 4/20 of all days, as you needed to get high, the drug that has brought pain into the Black/Brown community as it is illegal and yet like a glass of Chardonnay to the white folk, the light was shined in the other direction. And this time Derek Chauvin had 12 sets of eyes on him and in about 24 hours those eyes took the time to debate and decide his fate. Imagine had he given that same amount of time to George Floyd.

Detroit’s Finest

While there are few if any prosecutions for police misconduct there is this story below. I do find it odd that the excuse, justification, reasoning for the assault was that Police are lowly paid and in turn poorly trained.

 I feel that point has no bearing. Why not say “hey this is Detroit and we are a hot mess and this is how we pay the city coffers”  What is ironic is that the city coffers will be now drained thanks to the 1.3 million dollar judgment won by the Defendant/Plaintiff.  All that over a $125 ticket that has one too many parallels to other similar tales throughout the country.

From criminal exoneration’s to civil lawsuits, the excuses and the reasoning for undue and unnecessary force continue to amaze,  that even a Judge continues to tacitly ignore the sentencing bullshit that also puts us in the mess were in.  Can we say bias or is it a political stand about mandatory minimums? Going with the former on that.

How much time would I get if I beat down a cop and said I was poor, angry and suffered from income inequity?  The mandatory minimum would be off the table

Detroit-area officer gets 13 months in prison for assault

Associated Press
By ED WHITE, Associated Press 
 

DETROIT — A Detroit-area police officer whose bloody beating of a motorist was captured on dashcam video was sentenced to at least 13 months in prison Tuesday, with the judge rebuking him for “Dirty Harry tactics” but still handing down a punishment significantly below the guidelines.

William Melendez was an Inkster police officer a year ago when he stopped Floyd Dent, whose car had rolled past a stop sign.

Dent, 58, was pulled from his car and then punched in the head 16 times by Melendez. He suffered broken ribs, blood on his brain and other injuries.

The violent incident was recorded on a dashcam, but it wasn’t known publicly until weeks later when WDIV-TV aired the video. Inkster quickly agreed to pay $1.4 million to Dent, and assault charges against the veteran officer followed.

“You utilized your ‘Dirty Harry’ tactics and used excessive force. … The way you denigrated that man was awful,” Wayne County Judge Vonda Evans said, referring to the hard-edged police character made popular in several films by Clint Eastwood.

“Who would know and who would care about a lone black man being assaulted by upstanding police officers?” she added. “Boy, were you wrong.”

Melendez, 47, broke his silence and expressed remorse after declining to testify at trial.

“To Mr. Dent and his family, I am truly sorry,” he said as Dent watched from the front row in court.
Melendez finished his remarks by reading “The Final Inspection,” a poem that refers to a soldier or officer who wasn’t a “saint” but is welcomed to heaven because, “You’ve done your time in hell.”

In a statement read by a family member, Dent told the judge that Melendez served as “the judge, the jury and executioner” that night in Inkster.

“You were going to pull me over regardless of how I was driving,” Dent said. “Why? Because I was a black man in a Cadillac.”

The judge noted a lack of proper police training and low pay scales in some communities where officers make less than mall security guards. But she also said Melendez had carried out “cowardly acts of barbaric behavior” that were inexcusable.

“There’s an old sayin’: It ain’t no fun when a rabbit’s got the gun,” Evans said. “It’s equally applicable when he has the video — the eye of justice in this case.”

Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said Tuesday in a statement that “improper, predatory and illegal police conduct will not be tolerated.”

“The vast majority of police officers are hard-working law enforcers,” Worthy said. “Former officer Melendez was not one of them.”

The sentencing guidelines called for a minimum of 29 months to 57 months in prison, but the judge had the authority to go with less time. Melendez’s maximum punishment is 10 years in prison.

It’s up to the parole board to decide when to release Melendez once he’s eligible after 13 months. He’ll get credit for about three months served in jail since his assault conviction in November.

They Eat Their Young

The last week has brought about quite a turn of events with Judges and Prosecutors turning on each other as the proverbial shit hit the fan.

Orange County famous for their housewives, a series of unbelievable Police and Prosecutorial misconduct has led a Judge to condemn their entire Prosecutorial staff.  The article below from Slate is lengthy but well worth the read to understand how this is affecting legitimate cases as well as those who have found innocent individuals guilty as the zeal to persecute, whoops prosecute, dictate and dominate all rational thought, investigations and legality.

You’re All Out
A defense attorney uncovers a brazen scheme to manipulate evidence, and prosecutors and police finally get caught.

By Dahlia Lithwick
Slate

Prosecutorial and police misconduct are often dismissed as just a few bad apples doing a few bad apple-ish things. But what happens when it’s entrenched and systemic and goes unchecked for years? That looks to be the case in Orange County, California, where the situation got so completely out of hand this spring that Superior Court Judge Thomas Goethals issued an order disqualifying the entire Orange County District Attorney’s Office (that’s all 250 prosecutors) from continuing to prosecute a major death penalty case.

After literally years of alleged misconduct involving jailhouse informants, as well as prosecutors’ repeated failures to turn over exculpatory material, Judge Goethals determined in March that the office can simply no longer work on the case of mass murderer Scott Dekraai, who pleaded guilty last year to killing his ex-wife and seven others at a beauty salon in 2011.

Revelations of misconduct in the Dekraai case have raised questions about patterns of obstruction and deception that have unraveled various other murder cases in the county, which has a population larger than that of 20 different states. Other cases involving informants who were eliciting illegal confessions have emerged, entire cases have collapsed, and more may follow. The story goes way back to the 1980s, as R. Scott Moxley explains at length in the OC Weekly, to a prosecutorial scandal that ended in the execution of one defendant and a lengthy sentence for his alleged co-conspirator. Their convictions were based on the testimony of various jailhouse informants even though they told conflicting stories. That scandal rocked the area then, and this new one shows eerie parallels.

The story affords “a rare glimpse into something the criminal justice system does that it actually does all the time.”nAlexandra Natapoff, author of Snitching

All this is happening right up the road from Los Angeles, home of one of the most massive jailhouse informant scandals in history. In 1989, in an infamous interview with 60 Minutes and an explosive piece in the Los Angeles Times, former jailhouse snitch Leslie Vernon White demonstrated how he fabricated the confessions of other inmates, then leveraged them for reduced sentences. The White revelations led to a grand jury investigation that revealed that jailhouse snitches often lied, and that police and prosecutors—knowing they were lying—used them anyhow. L.A. has since enacted significant reforms of its jailhouse informant policies. Not so Orange County. And both the scope and scale of the Orange County shenanigans are remarkable.

One issue in the Dekraai case is whether deputies deliberately placed him near a prized informant to elicit illegal confessions. While preparing for the penalty phase of the trial, Santa Ana assistant public defender Scott Sanders, who is defending Dekraai, discovered that a jailhouse informant who had produced damning evidence about his client had done the same thing in another case Sanders was handling. After further investigation, Sanders claimed that a branch of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department called “special handling” would deliberately place jailhouse snitches in cells next to high-value inmates awaiting trials, with instructions to collect confessions, a practice that is unconstitutional.

Together with his law clerks, Sanders spent a year unearthing and then reconstructing a tranche of 60,000 pages of records indicating that the county sheriff’s office routinely used and coordinated with those informants to get around the constitutional prohibition on eliciting incriminating statements from defendants who had lawyered up and should not have been interrogated. The sheriff’s department has admitted that mistakes were made. The DA’s office claims there was nothing coordinated or systemic going on. But Judge Goethals disagreed, finding that the new revelations called into question the integrity of the entire Orange County District Attorney’s office.

Initially, Judge Goethals had ruled that the DA’s office was negligent in failing to turn exculpatory information over, finding that “the district attorney’s well-documented failures in this case, although disappointing, even disheartening to any interested member of this community, were negligent rather than malicious.” But that seems to have changed following further revelations of refusal to turn over evidence.

In an explosive moment following a hearing last year, Sanders revealed that the Orange County Sheriff’s Department has maintained a massive, secret, 25-year-old computerized record-keeping system called TRED. These TRED documents were full of potentially exculpatory data, but the agency officials had systematically refused to turn any of them over, or even acknowledge their very existence, to defense counsel.

In his March order, Goethals wrote: “It is now apparent that the discovery situation in this case is far worse than the court previously realized. In fact, a wealth of potentially relevant discovery material—an entire computerized data base built and maintained by the Orange County Sheriff over the course of many years which is a repository for information related directly to the very issues that this court was examining as a result of the defendant’s motion—remained secret, despite numerous specific discovery orders issued by this court, until long after the initial evidentiary hearing in this case was concluded and rulings were made.”

Laura Fernandez of Yale Law School, who studies prosecutorial misconduct, says it’s amazing that both the sheriff’s office and the DA’s office worked together to cover up the misconduct: “From my perspective,” she says, “what really sets Orange County apart is the massive cover-up by both law enforcement and prosecutors—a cover-up that appears to have risen to the level of perjury and obstruction of justice. Law enforcement officers and prosecutors in Orange County have gone to such lengths to conceal their wide-ranging misconduct that they have effectively turned the criminal justice system on its head: dismissing charges and reducing sentences in extraordinarily serious cases, utterly failing to investigate unsolved crimes and many murders (by informants—in order to prevent that evidence from ever getting to defense lawyers), while simultaneously pushing forward where it would seem to make no sense (except that it conceals more bad acts by the state), as in the case of an innocent 14-year old boy who was wrongfully detained for two years.”

Dekraai has already pled guilty to killing eight people, so the issue in his case is whether his due process rights have been violated with respect to his sentence. His attorney, Sanders, says he should be ineligible for the death penalty because of the misconduct by the prosecution and the sheriff’s department. Judge Goethals has thus far declined to take capital punishment off the table. California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office was supposed to have inherited the prosecution of the Dekraai case, but she has appealed Goethals’ ruling. She also announced that her office will launch an investigation into all allegations. That has elicited its own criticism, with legal experts suggesting that a truly independent investigation needs to be launched; one that recognizes that the close ties between the attorney general’s office and the DA’s office warrant a completely neutral commission.

What’s wrong with using jailhouse informants? It depends on how they are used. Testimony from snitches is certainly legal—even if the informant gets rewarded with a reduced sentence or material benefits or even cold, hard cash. But evidently the Orange County informants were deliberately moved to be closer to high value targets, they taped their conversations, and the records of much of this conduct were then hidden. As Dean Erwin Chemerinsky explains, the Constitution limits the use of jailhouse informants to situations in which statements are made voluntarily to cellmates, not orchestrated and recorded by jailhouse officials, all of which makes the interaction too much like an interrogation.

 The 1964 Supreme Court case Massiah v. United States bars the government from eliciting incriminating statements from a defendant after the right to counsel has kicked in. In Dekraai’s case the issue was how jailhouse informant Fernando Perez found his way into a cell next to Dekraai, befriended him, and then reported hearing him “bragging” about the Seal Beach murders.

The answer to that question is troubling. According to a 505-page motion filed by Sanders, Dekraai was somehow placed next to a guy known as “Inmate F,” (Perez) who then buddied up to Dekraai, heard all he had to say and then—to hear prosecutors tell it—came forward out of the goodness of his heart. As Sanders explained:

It appeared that the prosecution had been the recipient of extraordinarily good luck. The inmate housed closest to Dekraai was a good listener, a great note taker, and someone so selfless that he wanted to assist the OCDA [Orange County district attorney] and local law enforcement without wishing for anything in return. OCDA Investigator Erickson’s subsequently written report confirmed this picture of Inmate F. The prosecution promised nothing in return for his assistance, which was perfect for Inmate F. because he wanted nothing.

The problem for the Orange County District Attorney’s Office arose after Sanders started digging into details about Inmate F and happened upon, just for starters, a note in his file stating: “WAS TERMINATED AS A C.I. [confidential informant]—DO NOT USE AS A C.I.” as well as his colorful history of three-strikes convictions and conspiracies to murder fellow inmates.

Last August, Judge Goethals ruled that prosecutors couldn’t use the Perez statements during the penalty phase of the trial, but he also found that there was no evidence of a conspiracy, just that mistakes were made. But after Sanders found the TRED records, it became clear that sheriff’s officials—not a nurse, as they had sworn, under oath—had put Perez next to Dekraai’s cell, and that the violations were likely deliberate and coordinated.

Alexandra Natapoff, who teaches at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and wrote the book Snitching, explains that the reason this is an important story is that it affords “a rare glimpse into something the criminal justice system does that it actually does all the time.” She adds: “What’s newsworthy is not that it’s unique. What’s newsworthy is that we actually found out. What Scott Sanders did is a public service: He showed us something shocking and also unfortunately run of the mill.”

The problem with the system set up in Orange County, according to Sanders, was that jailhouse informants were asked to collect incriminating statements and then share them with prosecutors in exchange for reduced charges or other favors. Last November, the Orange County Register reported that two prolific informants with extensive criminal records had received more than $150,000 from law enforcement agencies for obtaining information from jailed suspects awaiting trials.

And even though snitching happens everywhere, and inmates are well aware that there are benefits to be gained for eliciting information, there are few mechanisms that exist to correct the perverse incentive to trade false information for rewards. As Moxley notes, the Los Angeles Times’ 1989 investigation, Jailhouse Snitches: Trading Lies for Freedom, exposed many of these problems. The article quoted Steve Vulpis, then an L.A. County Jail inmate, who admitted he and other informants told prosecutors anything they wanted to hear in order “to go home.” The story also quoted one informant from Orange County: “He was blunt in his assessment of courtroom shams conducted by other snitches and sponsored by the government, saying, ‘A way you can get around maybe not being able to get a confession right away [from a targeted inmate] is create one.’ ” The problem persists after all these years. In a report this week for America Tonight, Al Jazeera obtained damning tapes of likely Orange County snitches negotiating for testimony.

The Dekraai case became a turning point in Orange County when Judge Goethals got mad. He found that two deputies, Ben Garcia and Seth Tunstall, who belonged to the “special handling” unit dealing with informants, testified falsely to the court, denying the very existence of the TRED records at a crucial hearing last year. He also found that a prosecutor, Eric Petersen, had testified falsely.

Natapoff observes that another stunning aspect of the Orange County scandal is that a defense team was able to break through the prosecutors’ and sheriff’s office wall of silence. “Here you have longstanding collusion between the sheriff’s department and the DA’s office, and then the willingness to lie about the practice, even to the extent of committing perjury, under oath, in court to cover up those practices.” Noting that most everything about jailhouse informants happens in what she calls a “culture of secrecy,” Natapoff recalls that at the start of this case nobody would believe Sanders’ claims. He sounded like a conspiracy nut. This despite the fact that everyone knew this, or something like this, could be happening.

In the end it took a crusading public defender and a judge finally willing to believe him to smoke out the wrongdoing. In tossing the entire DA’s office off the Dekraai case, Judge Goethals wrote that “certain aspects of the district attorney’s performance in this case might be described as a comedy of errors but for the fact that it has been so sadly deficient. … There is nothing funny about that.” The disqualification of an entire prosecutor’s office rarely, if ever, occurs. But Judge Goethals finally concluded that in hiding exculpatory evidence, and then covering up the whole mess, the “District Attorney has a conflict of interest in this case, which has actually deprived this defendant of due process in the past.”

Why should we care what happens to Dekraai, a confessed serial murderer? We should care about the system, not the man who committed this atrocity. “Dekraai is a very bad defendant,” says Natapoff. “And we permit these unconstitutional practices to persist because at some level some people do feel that criminals should be apprehended by any means necessary and this exonerates the behavior of the law enforcement officials. But it’s a Faustian bargain,” she says, and it represents the cultural view of people who have “come to despair that justice can ever be conducted in a constitutional and lawful way.”

The constitutional protections built into our criminal justice system are not perfect. But the events of the past year in Orange County reveal that the alternative—a nihilistic sense that we can do whatever we must to nail the criminals—is far more dangerous. Especially if we let the most dangerous criminals walk in exchange for snitching in trivial cases. Yet more dangerous still is our tendency to turn a blind eye on the practices that are now coming to light in Orange County. They happen in secret because not enough people want to know about them. And they will continue to happen because so many people keep trying so hard not to care.

Then we have the Cleveland Prosecutor going “uh the Judge did it wrong.” Now usually these two are joined at the hip when it comes to Jurisprudence.  There are few Judges who will cross a Prosecutor as they wield the gavel in many municipalities and the Judges depend on their powerful allegiance to ensure re-election.  I mean when one’s constituents are felons it’s not as if they are planning to vote.

The incestuous co-dependence of Police, Prosecutors and Judges is something apparent if one spent any time observing the relationships between the parties when in court and particularly in trial.   So it is surprising to see any turn upon the other.

And we have one more episode of The World Turns.   Bad Judge! Bad! When a Prosecutor attempts to have a Judge removed that is not news as they prefer to have their partners-in-crime in the court. (yes pun intended)  Well thankfully he was admonished for doing so. Admonished. Bad Prosecutor! Bad!

State bar admonishes former Yakima County prosecutor Hagarty
By Molly Rosbach
Yakima Herald
May 23, 2015

Former Yakima County Prosecutor Jim Hagarty has received an admonition from the state bar association’s disciplinary board, bar documents show.

The admonition, a mild disciplinary order, was in response to a complaint filed by court consultant Harold Delia last May during the trial of the four suspects in the Vern Holbrook murder case.

Delia, who said he was acting as a concerned citizen and not in his official capacity, submitted the complaint after Hagarty in May 2014 wrote a four-page letter to Yakima County Superior Court presiding Judge David Elofson accusing Judge Ruth Reukauf of bias against prosecutors in several cases, including the Holbrook case, and asking that Elofson either persuade Reukauf to step aside or remove her.

Holbrook was a prominent real estate broker who died after being brutally attacked in May 2013. Prosecutors blamed a business deal gone bad for the death. A former business partner, Daniel Blizzard, was convicted of first-degree murder for orchestrating the attack. A second man, Luis Gomez-Monges, was convicted of the same charge for carrying out the attack. Reukauf eventually sentenced Blizzard to 341/2 years in prison and Gomez-Monges to nearly 27 years.

At the time of the trial, Delia said Hagarty’s efforts amounted to trying to intimidate the judge, particularly because Hagarty was not personally prosecuting the case and had not submitted his concerns via proper channels.

In his formal complaint, Delia wrote that “As a result of (Hagarty’s) letter, the defense attorneys have moved for dismissal of the murder charges based on prosecutorial misconduct. Consequently, the trial date has been delayed, which effects (sic) the speed trial rights of the defendants,” and that the dispute drew focus from the criminal trial.

“This letter has had a direct impact and cost on the administration of justice, the rights of each of the defendants, and potentially impacts public safety,” Delia wrote. “It is, at a minimum, an attack on the integrity of the judicial system.”

The review committee of the Washington State Bar Association’s disciplinary board signed the brief admonition document on April 29 and it was filed publicly 
May 15.

The admonition does not carry any sanctions or disciplinary actions, but Delia said he’s satisfied.

“For me, I wanted to make sure that it doesn’t happen again,” he said of Hagarty’s previous actions.

“I wasn’t really that interested in what the punishment was; I was more interested in that he was accountable for what he did, and I think this makes him accountable.”

Reached by phone, Hagarty said he has no comment on the order.

Texting for Dummies

Shrug. At least he feels bad.

LOCAL L.A. Now

3,000 cases possibly affected by S.F. police texting, D.A. say

  • San Francisco probes 3,000 cases that might have been tainted by police bias
San Francisco prosecutor expands probe into alleged misconduct by police
SF probe of police text messages expanded to look for a culture of bias in the department
Prosecutors here are expanding an investigation into criminal cases that might have been compromised by revelations of police officers’ racist, sexist and homophobic texts, Dist. Atty. George Gascon announced Thursday.

Gascon’s probe has so far identified 3,000 criminal cases that could have been affected by perceived bias by 14 officers. Investigators in a task force he created are combing through each case to determine whether some convictions must be overturned or pending cases dismissed.

“If just one individual was wrongly imprisoned because of bias on the part of these officers — that’s one too many,” Gascon said.

He said some pending cases already have been dismissed, and prosecutors so far have alerted defense attorneys of potential problems in about 60 other cases. The office is giving priority to cases that involve people who are behind bars. About 1,400 cases involved arrests but no prosecution.

The probe began after the U.S. attorney’s office filed a motion in March opposing bail for Ian Furminger, a former San Francisco police officer sentenced to 41 months in prison on various corruption-related charges. The motion, intended to prevent Furminger from obtaining bail while appealing his conviction, listed the texts.

The messages included slurs and disparaging references to African Americans and gays.
Police Chief Greg Suhr has so far recommended that six of the 14 officers who sent such texts be fired and has turned over the results of his investigation to the San Francisco Police Commission.

“We have been cooperating with the district attorney the whole time,” said Officer Grace Gatpamdan, an SFPD spokeswoman. She said some of the officers had “single incidents.The furor over the texts followed a series of law enforcement scandals in San Francisco in recent months. Sheriff’s deputies have been accused of staging gladiator-like fights among inmates in the jail, and Suhr was suspended for five days for failing to follow department policy in helping a female friend who was a victim of domestic violence.

San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi said he hopes the investigators will interview victims of discriminatory police actions instead of just reviewing documents.

“This is a systemic problem we have in San Francisco,” Adachi said.

He said African Americans are arrested and prosecuted at much higher rates than whites, adding, “This is not an isolated case of 14 officers.”

“This is a moral issue,” Brown said at a news conference with Gascon. “Everybody is guilty, whether Republican or Democrat, whether judge, probation officer or police officer.”

Gascon, a former Los Angeles Police Department assistant chief, served as San
The cases being reviewed go back 10 years, and Gascon acknowledged that some of the alleged officer misconduct took place on his watch.

“I feel terrible,” he said.

The task force’s findings will be made public. Gascon said he hopes the panel will complete the work by the end of the year, but no deadline has been set.

Gascon noted that police misconduct has stirred distrust in cities across the country.

“As recent revelations have shown, we are not immune,” Gascon said. “The actions of a few have undermined the public faith in the system.”

Throwing Stones

When the Economist, a right wing libertarian leaning magazine, starts throwing stones at Cops and in turn saying we are an incarceration nation, I am unsure if this is the pot meeting the kettle and calling it black, or in fact the Queen demanding that we are off our heads and rockers.

Funny that these same people are behind much of the prison population growth via encouraging private prisons, mandatory rates of population, exploiting prison labor, profiting from fees and fines, the monies earned from secondary industries such as home or electric monitoring, interlock devices, specialized insurance and of course the 1033 program that allows local police to have military grade equipment which is expensive to upkeep and maintain.

The irony that the very group that funds the elections of Attorney Generals and Judges while simultaneously funding public defenders and groups that work on exonerating prisoners and demanding less sentencing does make one want to have a laugh – a paraphrase from another Englishman – Ricky Gervais.

But here it is another criticism from across the pond. Perhaps the press did not have to hack into any one’s phones, crucify a teacher whose crime seemed to have bad hair (which I wrote about in this post) or simply pretend that they are innocent when it comes to bashing heads in pursuit of justice.

America’s police on trial
The United States needs to overhaul its law-enforcement system
Dec 13th 2014 |

THE store camera tells a harrowing tale. John Crawford was standing in a Walmart in Ohio holding an air rifle—a toy he had picked off a shelf and was presumably planning to buy. He was pointing it at the floor while talking on his phone and browsing other goods. The children playing near him did not consider him a threat; nor did their mother, who was standing a few feet away. The police, responding to a 911 caller who said that a black man with a gun was threatening people, burst in and shot him dead. The children’s mother died of a heart attack in the ensuing panic. In September a grand jury declined to indict the officers who shot Mr Crawford.

Most people have probably never heard this story, for such tragedies are disturbingly common: America’s police shoot dead more than one person a day (nobody knows the exact number as not all deaths are reported). But two recent cases have sparked nationwide protests. First Michael Brown, a black teenager, was shot dead in murky circumstances in Ferguson, Missouri, just after he robbed a shop, and then Eric Garner, a harmless middle-aged black man guilty only of selling single cigarettes on the streets of New York, was choked to death by a policeman while five cops watched—and this time the event was filmed by a bystander.

So far much of the debate within America has focused on race. That is not unreasonable: the victims were all black, and most of the policemen involved were white. American blacks feel that the criminal-justice system works against them, rather than for them. Some 59% of white Americans have confidence in the police, but only 37% of blacks do. This is poisonous: if any racial group distrusts the enforcers of the law, it erodes the social contract. It also hurts America’s moral standing in the world (not aided by revelations about the CIA’s use of torture—see article). But racial division, rooted as it is in America’s past, is not easily mitigated.

There is, however, another prism through which to examine these grim stories: the use of excessive violence by the state (see article). It, too, has complex origins, but quite a lot of them may be susceptible to reform. In many cases Americans simply do not realise how capricious and violent their law-enforcement system is compared with those of other rich countries. It could be changed in ways that would make America safer, and fairer to both blacks and whites.

Don’t shoot

Bits of America’s criminal-justice system are exemplary—New York’s cops pioneered data-driven policing, for instance—but overall the country is an outlier for all the wrong reasons. It jails nearly 1% of its adult population, more than five times the rich-country average. A black American man has, by one estimate, a one in three chance of spending time behind bars. Sentences are harsh. Some American states impose life without parole for persistent but non-violent offenders; no other rich nation does. America’s police are motivated to be rapacious: laws allow them to seize assets they merely suspect are linked to a crime and then spend the proceeds on equipment. And, while other nations have focused on community policing, some American police have become paramilitary, equipping themselves with grenade launchers and armoured cars. The number of raids by heavily armed SWAT teams has risen from 3,000 a year in 1980 to 50,000 today, by one estimate.

Above all, American law enforcement is unusually lethal: even the partial numbers show that the police shot and killed at least 458 people last year. By comparison, those in England and Wales shot and killed no one.

Fewer armoured cars, more body cameras

One reason why so many American police shoot first is that so many American civilians are armed. This year 46 policemen were shot dead; last year 52,000 were assaulted. When a policeman is called out to interrupt a robbery, he knows that one mistake could mean he never makes it to retirement. As this newspaper has often pointed out, guns largely explain why America’s murder rate is several times that of other rich countries. And the vastly disparate rate at which policemen shoot young black men is not simply a matter of prejudice. Roughly 29% of Americans shot by the police are black, but so are about 42% of cop killers whose race is known.

If America did not have 300m guns in circulation, much of this would change. That, sadly, is not going to happen soon. But there are other ways to make the police less violent.

The first is transparency. Every police force should report how many people it kills to the federal government. And if communities want to buy gadgets, they should give their police body cameras. These devices deter bad behaviour on both sides and make investigations easier. Had the officer who shot Mr Brown worn one, everyone would know how it happened.

The second is accountability: it must be easier to sack bad cops. Many of America’s 12,500 local police departments are tiny and internal disciplinary panels may consist of three fellow officers, one of whom is named by the officer under investigation. If an officer is accused of a crime, the decision as to whether to indict him may rest with a local prosecutor who works closely with the local police, attends barbecues with them and depends on the support of the police union if he or she wants to be re-elected. Or it may rest with a local “grand jury” of civilians, who hear only what the prosecutor wants them to hear. To improve accountability, complaints should be heard by independent arbiters, brought in from outside.

The third, and hardest, is reversing the militarisation of the police. Too many see their job as to wage war on criminals; too many poor neighbourhoods see the police as an occupying army. The police need more training and less weaponry: for a start, the Pentagon should stop handing out military kit to neighbourhood cops.

In many ways America remains a model for other countries. Its economic engine has roared back to life. Its values are ones which decent people should want to spread. Yet its criminal-justice system, the backbone of any society, is deeply flawed. Changing it will be hard; but change is overdue.

Its Called the BAR Association

There have been interesting stories about drunk lawyers of late, some serious and some well less so.

First up this one which I just love for a number of reasons. My comments are next to what I deem of import

Accused Midtown drunk driver is an ex-immigration lawyer

By Dana Sauchelli, Larry Celona, C.J. Sullivan and Ben Feuerherd

Or Above the Law that documents the Lawyer facing suspension for well taking nude pics of clients, that seems to be just one of the many problems with this Attorney and he charges you for the photos too! Bastard

Well Above the Law found out that they are not exempt from being sued for defamation by one of their own. Despite the fact that this Lawyer was also accused/convicted of raping and abducting a woman whom he met on Craigslist. Well it was CRAIGSLIST and his Lawyer could not get this guy off?! Well apparently this woman did not either. And now he is suing ATL for defamation. HILARIOUS.

And then on a more somber note, the Marshall Project, the blog site that is devoted to the problems in the Criminal Justice system has a disturbing article about the drunk and drugged lawyers who decided to crash that car in the courtroom while actually “defending” capital felony cases. Their state of mind is one of the many reasons one can apply for appeal which in many of these cases were denied.

Shocking, I know. The nice thing is that “Blawgers” are already decrying this site so it means they are hitting a proverbial nerve. The Bar Association goes out the way to ensure they are a professional organization there to ensure the sanctity of the law profession.

This is a club that puts sanctimony above arrogance. Sounds like the University of Virginia campus that trumps ethics and morality while also encouraging a drunken frat society that may or may not be culpable in one rape but the others, well no charges were filed so no crime occurred. First rule of law. Second rule is get the money up front.

And a throw away as another cop commits misdeeds and facing the justice system will be plea bargaining down. Not that this is surprising given the nature of the charges, sexual offenses against a minor and all. Not that the onerous lifetime penalties and punishments would have anything to do with it. Lifetime registry, public shaming, job loss and the scarlet letter of child rapist during that mandatory prison sentence not to mention being a cop and all. Solitary not as bad maybe?

Lesser charges recommended amid Trooper investigation

Updated: Dec 10, 2014 3
By Amanda Roberts
By Chad Darnall
LIVINGSTON COUNTY, KY – Misdemeanor charges.

That’s what one prosecutor is recommending be brought against a former state trooper. Donald Crawford suddenly resigned from Kentucky State Police in August, after sex abuse allegations surfaced from a traffic stop involving a minor in Livingston County

KSP conducted their own investigation recommending charges of official misconduct and sex abuse first degree and Commonwealth Attorney GL Ovey sees something else.

30 days later, Commonwealth Attorney, GL Ovey says his investigation is complete, finalizing his decision.

Ovey reviewed the investigation documenting accusations of misconduct and sexual abuse in a Livingston County parking lot, “This officer made a serious mistake, a serious lapse in judgment.”

But the case will go now to the Livingston County Attorney’s office, “As soon as we conclude today, I will forward this entire case file with all investigative interviews to Mr. Riley’s office,” says Ovey.

Ovey is handing over all materials. He says he’s recommending lesser charges, “These charges in my opinion misdemeanors are warranted and they should be pursued.”

Recognizing though some people make mistakes, he say public servants are different, “I’ve always believed a police officer, elected official should be held to a higher standard.”

I spoke with Trooper Crawford’s lawyer, Del Pruitt over the phone. He says although he hasn’t received all the evidence, he didn’t believe any felony charges would be recommended, and wasn’t sure if Cawford would be guilty of any misdemeanors.

I also got in touch with the Livingston County Attorney, Brian Riley. He told me he hasn’t received the evidence either, but he would most likely recuse or remove himself from the case because of past professional interactions with Crawford.

Because the case hasn’t been closed and involves a juvenile, the details to the case are sealed right now.

The initial investigation was completed by Kentucky State Post 2 because Crawford worked at Post One.

Hypocrisy or irony when it comes to law. Justice holds the scales and that is what she is measuring not guilt vs innocence.

The World Turns

Everyday. And the world should be turning over right now with every bizarro story that I read concerning the War on Drugs, the Militarized Police and the Attorneys who support and defend them.

I have no respect for anyone in that industry. Its an industry from every angle. But this story that Radley Balko had linked in his WAPO Blog was so fascinating that it was the equivalent of a Danielle Steele novel.

The facts are that there were actually no facts that led to the arrests of dozens of people whose lives were destroyed even though no charges were filed and they never committed any crime. A Prosecutor pursued the warrants, written by cops who lied to get said warrants, and a Judge signed off robo Judge style on said warrants. Mistakes were made lives ruined and no apology no nothing. Been there done that read the book and am in the movie.

Read the story The Snitch Who Stole Christmas: How Trinidad’s War on Drugs Attacked the Innocence. It is utterly fascinating about the sheer hubris, arrogance and ignorance of a local town gone nuts. It truly is a reflection of how the sum of the parts regarding the formula for our war on drugs.

Then we have the small towns with the Military guns. Literally even our local paper went a collective WTF? Well those drug dealers might have some serious firepower in the town of Snoqualimie. After having breakfast at the lodge, the biscuits and honey are well to die for.

The policy began with broken windows, well we are now windowless. That bullshit sociological study needs to be filed under the junk science plan along with trickle down economics.

The immense resources wasted on prosecuting and incarcerating innocent people or people guilty of victimless crimes, crimes that are often about mental illness with no assistance and follow up for recovery continue to plague our country.

This morning on BBC America another story of a man falsely accused, convicted and imprisoned as a teenager for a crime he did not commit. It took over 15 years to actually convince a Judge of that fact (including coecering the Judge to go outside in the dark on the street in Compton to challenge eye witenss testimony) while spending most of his youth behind bars and never knowing his son who was born while he was in prison. The “whoops wrong guy” and his story is just one of men. Google the phrase “release of innocent or wrongly convicted” there are story after story.

So really keeping your trust in this system is akin to keeping your money under your mattress. Because they will simply seize that under civil forfeiture laws.

Reform is necessary. Former Police are admitting there are real problems but to go about a full 180 they will have to more than 3 months of training. This is a house that needs to be demolished and utterly rebuilt. There have been editorials after editorials discussing their experiences and beliefs that have long been ingrained into the badge and the ethics or lack thereof behind it.

The Atlantic Monthly proposes that in fact that policy needs to be amended to include their own. Well turnabout is fair play.

But if all of this has upset you buck up little camper, unless however, you are a law student at Columbia. There the adminstration was so concerned of its privileged law students they are given them a late pass to take final exams. How traumatic it must be knowing that you are going to become highly compensated Lawyers of which you have paid an excessive fee for or underemployed maybe but not likely given that pedigree, to uphold laws that are basically a refelction of our two tiered society. Poor little babies! Again if you think its just one sided no. It’s about wealth. And the wealthy need to be shielded from the great unwashed and the trauma we cause.

Why are Americans so willing to continue to vote and re-elect these people who do nothing? Literally many of them do nothing or do things without any supervision or transparency. Funny you all want Teacher’s reviews made public, you want everyone to be punished for life for errors made in the past, yet you ask nothing of other public servants with regards to their employment history. Wow this is some daddy issues times 10.

I work with Teachers trust me they are not all that bright either but when it comes down to it they do way less harm and some good.

Public Shaming

I found this on American Prospect and I think it accurately explains the reasoning why there is no Justice nor peace when it comes to Police misconduct, malfeasance, murder and abuse.  They are not only often legally immune they are utterly encouraged to do so by a system willing to do what it takes to protect one from crime.

And that nothing will come of these protests but the public shaming and at least the anger does send a message. It will be ignored and of course many elected officials will clutch their pearls but that is all you will see. Since Ferguson began already the matter of Police and the grants to get excess military equipment has already been dropped.  Undoubtedly the move to provide body cameras will as well.

We pretend we have this crusade against crime. And we have supposedly a drop in crime.  Funny our Courts are still overwhelmed, fines and jail terms still fill the city coffers so what crime is this?  Crime that has little to do with society or community but with racial and other extraneous often moral components that society has deemed dangerous.  Pot smoking, drug using, drinking.   It is why you see misdemeanors as the majority of offenses prosecuted and  why they are turned into felonies after that magical number “3” again.

There is no substantiation, logic or research to back up why it became three strikes your out except its used in sports and that seemed to work.  If you think that is too far fetched then you have really never looked at some of the laws on the books in detail and the minutiae in which law makers go into to define and penalize individuals for some minor offense.  This is a great explanation of how this absurd concept came into being and where it began it is now looking toward ending.. irony isn’t it. We loathe California for it’s supposed liberal nature but there is nothing about this law that is liberal.

I read of today where our Court of Appeals overturned a Judge’s inane punishment that included standing on an intersection with a sign identifying who she was and what she did for 4 hours a day.  The Prosecutor even thought it was unnecessary after jail and fines but the Judge demanded it or she was to return to jail. The appellate court thought it was public shaming that was not a part of any legislative punitive punishment required by the offense;  yet I think that sex registry and in turn minor misdemeanors that can never be expunged from one’s record is the same thing – public shaming.

Shame we don’t have the stocks.

10 Ways the System Is Rigged Against Justice for People Wrongly Killed by Cops

Steven Rosenfeld

This article was orginally published by AlterNet. For more great reporting and analysis, subscribe here to AlterNet’s newslette

Plea a Cop

I love that much is made about Teacher’s Unions and how the keep bad teachers in classes. Really? Really this bad?

And much is made about the NFL players and their in house detention plan, makes you miss school even more right?

Well become a Cop, kill a person, bash their skull in and on your day off do the same. You will keep your job. The Police Unions are more corrupt and venal than the actual cops. And even if and when charged for a crime the reality is they do less time and in turn less public penance, jail times and of course fees and fines that fund a fuel this system of corruption and condenmnation.

This is from the Atlantic Monthly.

How Police Unions and Arbitrators Keep Abusive Cops on the Street
Officers fired for misconduct often appeal the decision and get reinstated by obscure judges in secretive proceedings
.

Conor Friedersdorf
Dec 2 2014,

When Frank Serpico, the most famous police whistleblower of his generation, reflected on years of law-enforcement corruption in the New York Police Department, he assigned substantial blame to a commissioner who failed to hold rank-and-file cops accountable. That’s the classic template for police abuse: misbehaving cops are spared punishment by colleagues and bosses who cover for them.

There are, of course, police officers who are fired for egregious misbehavior by commanding officers who decide that a given abuse makes them unfit for a badge and gun. Yet all over the U.S., police unions help many of those cops to get their jobs back, often via secretive appeals geared to protect labor rights rather than public safety. Cops deemed unqualified by their own bosses are put back on the streets. Their colleagues get the message that police all but impervious to termination.

That isn’t to say that every officer who is fired deserves it, or that every reinstated cop represents a miscarriage of justice. In theory, due process before a neutral arbiter could even protect blue whistleblowers from wrongful termination. But in practice, too many cops who needlessly kill people, use excessive force, or otherwise abuse their authority are getting reprieves from termination.

* * *

Let’s begin in Oakland, California, where the San Jose Mercury News reports that “of the last 15 arbitration cases in which officers have appealed punishments, those punishments have been revoked in seven cases and reduced in five others.”

Hector Jimenez is one Oakland policeman who was fired and reinstated. In 2007, he shot and killed an unarmed 20-year-old man. Just seven months later, he killed another unarmed man, shooting him three times in the back as he ran away. Oakland paid a $650,000 settlement to the dead man’s family in a lawsuit and fired Jimenez, who appealed through his police union. Despite killing two unarmed men and costing taxpayers all that money, he was reinstated and given back pay.

Another Oakland police officer, Robert Roche, was present at the 2011 Occupy protest where Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen, a protester, was shot in the head with a lead-filled beanbag, fracturing his skull and causing brain damage. After Olsen collapsed onto the asphalt, a group of fellow protesters quickly gathered around to help the wounded man. That’s when Roche tossed a flash grenade in their midst.

Olsen later spoke out about the incident in the video clip below (ignore the part where he calls the officer a “serial killer,” a proposition for which I can find no evidence, and focus on the images of the incident itself, which is rendered appropriately):

Roche was fired after being identified as the perpetrator, but appealed with the help of his union and was reinstated. Federal Judge Thelton Henderson later ordered an investigation of the Oakland Police Department’s disciplinary appeals process, declaring that “imposition of discipline is meaningless if it is not final.”

* * *

“In Philadelphia, an inquiry was recently completed on 26 cases where police officers were fired from charges ranging from domestic violence, to retail theft, to excessive force, to on duty intoxication,” Adam Ozimek writes in a Forbes article on reforms to policing. “Shockingly, the Police Advisory Committee undertaking the investigation found that so far 19 of these fired officers have been reinstated. Why does this occur? The committee blamed the arbitration process.”

One case is cited as a highlight. In September 2012, Lieutenant Jonathan Josey was caught on a cell-phone video doing this:

He was fired, appealed as permitted by his labor agreement, got reinstated, and retained his rank.

* * *

Alex Zimmerman of the Pittsburgh City Paper has details about police arbitration in his town:

In June 2008, after downing six drinks as part of his wife’s birthday celebration on the South Side, Paul Abel was accused of accidentally shooting a 20-year-old man he was trying to pistol-whip. In December 2009, Eugene Hlavac was accused of slapping his ex-girlfriend (and his son’s mother) so hard that he dislocated her jaw. And in November 2010, Garrett Brown was accused of running two delivery-truck drivers off the road in a fit of rage—an allegation similar to those made against Brown in at least one other late-night traffic encounter.

Each of these men, who were all Pittsburgh Police officers at the time of the incidents, shares a common experience: They all were fired, charged criminally, cleared of those charges … and then got their jobs back through arbitration. And they’re not alone. Nine officers were fired by the city between 2009 and 2013, but five of those terminations were overturned by an arbitrator, according to Pittsburgh Public Safety Director Mike Huss. (In all, says Huss, the city filed 269 disciplinary-action reports in that period, 33 of which involved suspensions.) In the cases where terminations were appealed by the police union through arbitration, officers got their jobs back close to 70 percent of the time, according to figures provided by Huss.

A police official sums things up: “Why would you employ a police officer that pistol-whipped and accidentally shot someone on his night off? The common person says, ‘This is crazy.’ And they’re right: It is crazy. It’s just never gotten enough attention.”

What does the other side say? Here’s the perspective of Bryan Campbell, “a veteran lawyer for the Pittsburgh’s chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police,” commenting on the cop who accidentally shot a man he was trying to drunkenly pistol-whip:

Abel has been widely held up as an example of an officer who shouldn’t have gotten his job back, but Campbell says the picture is more complicated. Though Abel was off duty when he shot someone on the street, Campbell explains, he was sucker-punched and was only trying to arrest the culprit. It just didn’t turn out to be the guy he shot. “All he was trying to do is arrest somebody who was guilty of an assault,” Campbell says, although he adds, “Should he have taken his gun out in those circumstances? Probably not.”

He shot a totally innocent person while drunk … but there was a different guy somewhat nearby that was guilty of assault, which is supposed to make it all less egregious. I wonder how a police officer would treat that explanation if a non-cop tried it.

* * *

Another case comes from Sarasota, Florida. “An internal investigation had concluded that Scott Patrick violated department policies when he punched, choked, and cursed at Jason B. Dragash, then 29, while arresting him on August 4, 2012, at the Ivory Lounge nightclub on Main Street,” the Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported. “The incident was recorded on video, in which Patrick can be seen repeatedly punching Dragash, who was on the floor surrounded by other police officers. The resulting criminal investigation stated that Patrick gave misleading information to detectives investigating the incident, and evidence for a charge of battery was sent to the State Attorney’s Office. Prosecutors declined to take the case.”

Here’s how the police chief at the time characterized the incident: “First, he punched the individual an excessive number of times. Second, he had an opportunity to stop after the person’s arm was pinned but failed to do so. Third, he made a statement immediately after the incident that ‘I should have killed him.'”

After Patrick appealed his punishment with the help of his police union, an arbitrator ruled that he should have been suspended for 30 days rather than being fired.

* * *

In Ballinger, Texas, a policeman was fired for uttering racial slurs. But “there was a procedural error in the termination paperwork filed,” so he got his gun and badge back. (It isn’t clear if a police union played any role in this particular case.)

* * *

Police officer Phillip Reynolds of Centralia, Washington, has an incredible story:

A 2011 investigation into Reynolds’ frequent use of his Taser found he excessively used it on multiple people, many of whom were involved in minor, non-violent offenses, for extended periods of time—sometimes up to 30 seconds. The investigation also found he was dishonest in his police reports about the circumstances of using the Taser. As a result, Reynolds was suspended for two weeks without pay. He returned to duty and was ordered to undergo additional training. The 2011 suspension, however, was not Reynolds’ first warning about his behavior. By that point, Reynolds had already received multiple verbal and written warnings about other policy violations including reckless behavior, failing to show up for trial and arresting someone without probable cause.

In the police chief’s letter of reprimand to Reynolds, dated July 12, 2011, it stated: “This is truly the final opportunity for you to make some fundamental changes … Future violations of departmental policy will be dealt with in the most severe terms and may result in your dismissal from employment.”

Despite that warning, Reynolds’ attitude reportedly grew worse in 2011. According to a legal brief submitted to the arbitrator by the city defending the termination, Reynolds spent the large majority of his shift hiding out, avoiding responding to calls or interacting with his coworkers and supervisors. In January 2012, the administration launched another internal investigation against Reynolds and found he violated eight additional policies, including insubordination, cooperation with other employees and failing to aid other officers.

He then was fired.

His union stood by him, per their assigned role.

The arbitrator upheld the two-week suspension—that is to say, the obviously inadequate punishment for needlessly tasing people—but overruled his termination. Fighting to protect officers like Reynolds is part of what police unions do. Some on the left are starting to realize the problem this presents for solidarity.

* * *

Miami police officer Reynaldo Goyos shot and killed an unarmed 28-year-old, Travis McNeil, as he sat in his car. Lynette Holloway of The Root wrote about the case. A review by the police department ruled the shooting “unjustified” and stated that the physical evidence was inconsistent with the officer’s account. He was fired, appealed, and was reinstated, at which point a police-union official said this about the tragedy: “Imagine calling the police and in the face of danger, our police officers run and hide. We have no duty to retreat and as police officers we don’t shy away in the face of danger. Unlike some of our policymakers, we aren’t cowards.”

* * *

In Narberth Borough, Pennsylvania, the people’s elected representatives voted unanimously to fire police officer Michael Gannon for what they called “alleged neglect or violation of official duties and inefficiency, neglect, intemperance, disobedience of orders and conduct unbecoming of an officer.” This news story doesn’t outline his transgressions with any more specificity, but the terms of his reinstatement may provide clues:

The ruling also said that the reinstatement was on a last-chance basis and “acknowledging that any further misconduct or violation of department rules of regulations will subject him to immediate termination.” Finally, the ruling ordered Gannon to “remain sober, to be subjected to random alcohol testing, and to provide the Borough with monthly reports from his treatment provider vouching for the Grievant’s sobriety and confirming his ongoing treatment.”

* * *

While a sergeant, David Woolverton was fired for his role in a police sex scandal in Lakeland, Florida. His chief testified that he has “a history of sexual misconduct or allegation [sic] of this behavior that goes back a number of years.” The local newspaper reports that 15 years before, he was “accused and disciplined for having a relationship with a high school student who was interning with the department.” He admitted to having sex with a colleague while in his vehicle at a city park, but denied that colleague’s allegations that “he forced her to have sex with him on top of her desk at LPD headquarters or that they had sex while on duty.” State Attorney Jerry Hill wrote a letter declaring that she would no longer accept his testimony in criminal cases, making him useless as a street officer.

So by what logic did this man get his job back (with a year of back pay)?

In Woolverton’s case, arbitrator Harry Mason wrote that Woolverton received a harsher penalty than some other officers in similar situations. One of those, former Lt. Shawn Collins, was demoted in 2012 after investigators learned he had sex with an officer applicant and appeared to aid her hiring.

Collins is now an officer.

The mind reels.

* * *

These are just a small selection of cases drawn from recent headlines. Yet they alone illustrate why reform is so important. Would you want your town policed by these men?

Society entrusts police officers with awesome power. The stakes could not be higher when they abuse it: Innocents are killed, wrongly imprisoned, beaten, harassed—and as knowledge of such abuses spreads, respect for the rule of law wanes. If police officers were at-will employees (as I’ve been at every job I’ve ever held), none of the cops mentioned above would now be walking the streets with badges and loaded guns. Perhaps one or two of them deserved to be exonerated, despite how bad their cases look. Does the benefit of being scrupulously fair to those individuals justify the cost of having more abusive cops on the street?

I’d rather see 10 wrongful terminations than one person wrongfully shot and killed. Because good police officers and bad police officers pay the same union dues and are equally entitled to labor representation, police unions have pushed for arbitration procedures that skew in the opposite direction. Why have we let them? If at-will employment, the standard that would best protect the public, is not currently possible, arbitration proceedings should at a minimum be transparent and fully reviewable so that miscarriages of justice are known when they happen. With full facts, the public would favor at-will employment eventually.