Back to School

The Fourth of July is normally the mid point of summer, with families scheduling vacations around this date and the hot days of this month are marked by summer camps and other extracurriculars that have kids still socializing and experiencing some type of emotional and intellectual stimulation if not growth.  Right, that is if you have money and access.  Few if any programs exist other than local community centers that like the rest of the services for the great unwashed are quite limited.  Needless to say the antiquated notion of school running for nine months a year with the summer off might have to go the way with the rest of our former ideas on how to manage and operate the United States. Let’s face it folks, when Grocery Store workers, delivery drivers, public transportation operators and those others without degrees or established professional identities (think cooks, cleaners and other lower elements to the totem pole) are considered “essential” then we have a lot to rethink.  They were lumped in with Doctors and other medical professionals or “front line workers” who were there to basically do their job in surreal circumstances, and again those circumstances are the same with the kids going to camp, academy’s and the like during summer break, the staff that work at wealthy hospitals that serve wealthy families.  I have already put up the story about New York’s crisis with regards to how patients were treated, no, handled in public hospitals when they landed there for treatment.  If they were lucky they were shoved to the naval ship or the Javitz Center or the religious tent in Central Park but those numbers were few and far between and many never made it out of the hospital in anything but a body bag.

Yes American medical care is exceptional in that it has two classes of patients – the have and the have nots.  I am 99.9% sure that is why Harborview Hospital mistreated me in 2012 as they did not verify my insurance until after I was dismissed and in turn the damage was already done.  Anyone setting foot in that shithole well good luck to you, its only a miracle I did not die from their mistreatment and I suspect many have been now and no one will ever know as they don’t have a massive newspaper with resources to cover this story as most other cities do either so those stories will go untold and the bodies dumped in the potter’s field or thrown into storage trucks parked on roadsides as they are here.

**and for the record the local presses have been very active in uncovering major scandals.. It was the Keating 5 that came out of local press and the story about Boeing from The Seattle Times and there are many many more, The Boston Herald as the Priest scandal that without their local investigative journalism many stories like these would go unknown and the culprits on with their lives, like now but without a good movie. ****

In fact many of the unclaimed belongings are lost in the halls, closets or trash bins never to find a home or place to rest as well. Again if you think that staff aren’t stealing some of these things, think again. Drug theft is the most common (and that includes Doctors as well)  but they take whatever is not locked down if you don’t believe me,  ask this Nurse. I find it a miracle that I walked out with any jewelry or belongings from my incident.  Nurses are two bit cunts, and many others who work inside are lowly paid persons who frankly are largely ignored exploited workers, so they likely steal to use it to pawn.  I suspect why they have not raided that cookie jar is largely due to the fact that everyone is so bloody scared of Covid they aren’t touching that shit but what they can take, they will.  Again its hard to think of these “heroes” doing such a thing, yeah remember when you felt that way about Cops?

Here is the next casualty on the horizon, public schools and universities.  The reality is that States are driven by the budget crisis to cut everything from everything. So if you think public health and education are already cut to the bone, think again.  This is an irony on top of a crisis as now more than ever how schools and hospitals go forward will be a demanding if not expensive operation for decades to come. And in fact should be the norm as to ensure that parity and equity are finally achieved for all those who don’t have the privileges afforded them for being just essential workers.  I do find that hilarious that the dude who poured my coffee everyday and the other who brought my food had bigger role than my Accountant and Attorney whom I have not spoken to since this began is something that doesn’t surprise me, as I rarely did and they are both new having fired the last Accountant and had just contacted the Attorney to set up some business trust and get my estate in order.  Again more irony.   I have no idea if we ever will meet or I will find someone else as I never wrote a check or followed up after the quarantine went down.  So much for essential.

I don’t think any public teacher wants to set foot in any classroom without heavy duty protections in place, the same go with College Professors.  The reality is that the two cohorts who have the most problem following instructions and complying with order are kids, regardless of age.  I actually think of all kids, High Schoolers, would be the most easiest to work with as they are just of an age to rationalize what this means, the worst middle schoolers.  Then of course those in the first year or two of College are equally disrespectful as they have entitlement tattooed on their forehead as they are convinced their entrance means they are special, like everyone else.  What.ever.  So after binge drinking, pledging a Fraternity and then drugging some girl up to rape behind a dumpster I am sure they have no problem monitoring their health, wearing a mask and following social distance protocols.

This is what current Academics are saying with regards to returning to campus. And this will also be the guidelines for those in K-12 as who do you think are telling the White Daddies what to do. This is the “brain trust” who come up with these ideas, then go “Fuck this is not working out.” Because trying to tell people how to behave and guide human behavior when they won’t listen, don’t care, assume its a game, political, fraud, made up, will go away, the fault of some Chinese person or whatever other bullshit falls out of the mouth of Trump, tells you everything you need to know in why this shit is hitting the fan.  Then you have a media whose sole job is to not actually ask questions, seek varying opinions and follow stories that have the ability to fact check and substantiate, you got more problems. As I have read repeatedly stories that contradict, stories that have odd blank or missing facts without any critical analysis offered.   We have seen opinion pieces and ads published without editorial oversight and more importantly, actual scientific reports printed only to be retracted days and weeks later without any real warning noted at print time advising  that this may not be all that and a bag of chips has instead become the daily Covid Caller.   And these are from the papers that have serious reputations that over the years despite their own roles in major fuckups, (Iran, that one was bad there NYT) (oh and the Post you ain’t innocent either)  they are still considered the bellwether; so, when they screw it up we are screwed. Folks, most people are idiots, just ask the bleach drinkers.

And these same bleach drinkers breed, right there a problem, but do you honestly expect their children to be these compliant, well behaved individuals intent on following instructions and monitoring their behavior? Have you ever been to a public school?  They barely managed online learning, disrupting those classes when and if they ever showed.  So again, what about school?

Just ask these Teachers in Texas, hot bed for Covid 20 which seems worse than Covid 19. And of course the fish stinks from the head and so the White Daddies are putting this all on local districts without any guidance, let alone actual facts on how to do this, so I think this is like hospitals. The rich get all the goodies and the poor, well they can do what they always do, sink or swim.  Oh don’t know how to swim? Well yeah that costs extra and we don’t have any extra sauce for you kid.  Oh shit, (pun intended)  it is like Chipolte.  From parking lot fights to gun toting crazies if there is not another reason to set foot in that fast food dump there it is.  That place was a hot bed of norovirus numerous times,  you know like Covid, but less deadly.  So again if you think all these fights and furies are bad now, just wait.

Texas Teachers Consider Leaving The Classroom Over COVID-19 Fears

The Association of Texas Professional Educators recently surveyed some 4,200 educators. About 60% said they were concerned about their health and safety heading into the 2020-21 school year.

Laura Isensee | Posted on June 30, 2020,

For 40 years, Robin Stauffer has taught high school English in seven different school districts in three different states. Most recently, Advanced Placement English in Katy, where she says working with kids has kept her young and lighthearted.

But since the pandemic hit, a question has nagged at her: Is it time to retire?

“I was very upset and sad. I was torn. I went back and forth,” Stauffer said.

On the one hand, she isn’t ready to leave the classroom. She’s still passionate about why she joined the profession in the first place: “To be the type of teacher that I wish I would have had when I was in public school, to kind of right the wrongs that I experienced.”

On the other hand, she knows how hard it is to maintain a campus with thousands of students. Before COVID-19, district administrators in Katy reduced their custodial staff, and it was often up to teachers to clean their own rooms.

“They don’t supply hand sanitizer. They don’t supply wipes. None of these supplies were ever given to us. You just used what you had or what teachers themselves purchased,” she said.

Stauffer waited for the Katy Independent School District to release safety plans for back-to-school. Instead, she’s seen what she called a “back-to-normal” attitude.

And then she had to consider her health: She’s 66 years old, has diabetes and a family history of heart disease, all making her more vulnerable to the coronavirus.

“I just don’t trust the school district to safeguard my health during this pandemic,” she said.

Like Stauffer, many Texas teachers are on edge and considering leaving the profession even as the state’s education commissioner has declared it “safe for Texas public school students, teachers, and staff to return to school campuses for in-person instruction this fall.”

As many as one in five U.S. educators say they’re unlikely to return to the classroom because of the coronavirus, according to a national survey conducted before Texas indicated its light-handed approach to reopening schools.

“There are people that have already made the decision to quit,” said Zeph Capo, president of the Texas American Federation of Teachers. “There’s certainly a lot of people that are considering it. I’ve heard from others as well, too. They’re single parents and they don’t have a lot of choice.”

“So they’re depending on us,” Capo said, “to help make sure that they are afforded as much safety as possible in doing that. So that’s what keeps me moving.”

Higher risk

Nearly one-third of U.S. teachers are 50 years or older, according to federal data. That puts them at higher risk of becoming seriously ill from the virus. And the publication Education Week has identified more than 300 school staff and former educators who’ve died from COVID-19.

“There’s obviously a lot of fear because there are so many unanswered questions,” said Noel Candelaria, president of the Texas State Teachers Association.

He says school staff with underlying health conditions are also concerned. Consider his own family: Candelaria is married to Patty, who is a dyslexia therapist and has had three surgeries to fix a congenital heart defect.

“There are educators, like my wife, who if the districts do not provide an alternative method for them to do their job from home without exposing themselves, (they) are seriously considering a medical leave,” Candelaria said.

Texas public school districts are still waiting for safety and health guidelines from the Texas Education Agency. They were scheduled to be released last week, but were delayed after the Texas Tribune published draft rules indicating few mandatory safety measures.

That has weighed on many teachers.

“We can’t just talk about student health and safety without talking about educator health and safety, because they’re sharing the same space,” Candelaria said.

The Association of Texas Professional Educators recently surveyed some 4,200 educators. About 60% said they were concerned about their health and safety heading into the 2020-21 school year.

Sso far, however, that concern hasn’t translated into an increase in retirements. Nearly 22,000 teachers and state employees have retired this fiscal year, compared to about 25,000 last year, according to the Teacher Retirement System.

Few mandates

Gov. Greg Abbott has said districts will have some flexiblity in implementing safety protocols, and allowing families to continue remote learning.

“The state has already made allocations and is prepared to continue allocations of masks for schools, allowing, I think, for a level of flexibility at the local school district level to make the best determinations for the schools in that district about what the mask requirement should be,” Abbott told KBTX-TV in a recent interview.

But, the Republican governor has told state lawmakers Texas won’t mandate schools to require face coverings or test for COVID-19 symptoms.

“It was really shocking because it seems like nobody cares what’s going to happen in the schools,” said Kristen McClintock, who’s taught special education for six years at a large Houston high school.

She has a newborn and a toddler at home and doesn’t want to expose them to the virus. Nor does she want to expose her students with disabilities, whom she says she misses a lot.

“We’re almost like a family,” McClintock said. “So it’s been really hard to not be able to see them for months. I want to see some of them graduate next year”

But every night she and her husband discuss if they can afford for her to quit and rely on his income as an online tutor.

“It would cut our finances in half,” she said. “We would have to lean on support probably from family to try and get by.”

No choice

McClintock is still deciding. First, she wants to see more health data and detailed plans from the Houston Independent School District.

But veteran educator Stauffer has made up her mind. She turned in her resignation in May.

“All my life, I’ve been a teacher,” Stauffer said. “That is who I am. And to give up my identity, it will be challenging, but I don’t feel like I had another choice.”

She cleaned out her classroom, said goodbye to students over Zoom and didn’t have any real celebration.

That is, until some of her colleagues surprised her with a car parade, waving signs and balloons as they drove by — a fitting end to a 40-year career, in the age of COVID-19.

Divided We Fall

The Virus does not know class, race, gender, age, ethnicity or any extraneous factors that make you special.  It does however give a clear distinction when access and availability to escape from quarantine, curfew, large mass populations and potential zones of infection.   Living in a small apartment with multiple family members makes it tight in the best of circumstances in the worst, impossible. There is where the rich have the distinction to live in larger spaces, have second even third homes to escape to and of course private planes and other modes of transportation that lessen potential infected contacts.  But that is a small circle in which to travel and we have seen some famous and others who run in that crowd survive and others not as again the virus takes no prisoners.

This is one example of how the rich are distinctly different and this is another how the poor try to stay alive when all the rugs, nets and floors beneath them have fallen and the roof over their head is next.   And of course the shops and stores where the elite greet and meet and the aspirant class desire to own have literally shuttered their stores in fear of the great unrest which will occur but I am not sure we are storming the gates of Versailles and taking the Vuitton.

When I read this story I understood it in ways that few do.  I live alone, however, have no extended family and am currently without health insurance due to the move.  I could have purchased insurance without the marketplace but right at the same time the outbreak began and I felt given my age I would likely be refused and at this point I thought if I survived something this serious what then?  Throw myself under the bus as I would be broke and have no job or even prospects given my age and with the 4 plus million unemployed who is hiring me?. When you have nothing and no one you simply live in the moment.  And perhaps that is why I am vested in being the biggest bitch ever and taking that vow of silence as a means of coping and moving forward until I can come to terms with what this was and how to rationalize this.  I cannot change others behaviors but I can change my response and behavior and so I shall.  In the interim I will still take long walks just stay well away now or even later on. Thanks

No Longer Just a Walk in the Park

The New York Times
By Jodi Kantor
March 27, 2020

I’m 77 years old and I want/need to walk. The two buildings in my complex have a basketball court between them. I have previously taken the freight elevator down 36 stories at 5:30 a.m., meeting no one but armed anyway with mask, gloves, wipes and hand sanitizer. I walked for 35 minutes and went back upstairs, again meeting nobody. Should I force myself to continue? I am simply afraid to go outside.

Ms. Motola’s world has mostly shrunk to one room. She lives by herself in a studio apartment high above Manhattan, with a piano, books and a narrowing set of routines. Her longtime habit of swimming laps is on pause. So are her dates with her children and grandchildren.

“The walking was truly helping me keep it together,” she said on the telephone. But she stopped a week ago and hasn’t left her building since. “As this ramped up, I kept weighing anything and everything I was thinking about doing outside, and saying: ‘Is it worth getting sick for? Is it worth dying for?’”

She’s not the only one asking. The outdoors is now contested ground. Parks and trails from Los Angeles to the Great Smokies are being closed. (Too many people were socially distancing in the same places, and therefore not at all.) Authorities are patrolling others, warning people to disperse. This week, India’s prime minister told 1.3 billion people not to set foot outside their homes. “Stay Home Save Lives” has become a rallying cry and a pressure point on social media.

“If you’re still not sure about an activity, skip it,” said Kate Brown, the governor of Oregon, one of 22 states and counting where residents have been told to keep to their residences.

While some continue to congregate, many others are now worried about venturing outside at all. “Can we sit on an open lawn with a family member?” a reader from India wrote to ask.

The unpleasant truth, especially for city dwellers, is that every time you step outdoors, your risk of infection rises. Last week, scientists established that coronavirus droplets could linger in the air for a half-hour, raising new concerns about what is safe. Then there’s every surface you encounter on your way outside and back: doorknobs, keys, elevator buttons, gates, the carton of eggs you pick up at the deli that’s still open.

“The safest way to prevent the spread of this virus is for you to stay at home,” said Dr. Craig Spencer, a global emergency medicine specialist at Columbia. “This virus won’t infect you if it never meets you.”

But when we posed Ms. Motola’s dilemma to Dr. Spencer and other public health experts, along with scientists who study the virus’s behavior in air, each one recommended that she resume her dawn walks.

“We’re all struggling with a greater degree of ambient risk than we’re used to,” said Dr. Tim Lahey, an infectious disease specialist and ethicist at the University of Vermont. Each day is an exercise in trying to lower risk: avoid this, scrub that.

Public health practice is as much about reducing risk, as eliminating it — which is often impossible. The AIDS crisis was not stemmed by persuading people to quit sex, Dr. Lahey said. Instead, people adopted tolerable rules like choosing partners carefully and wearing condoms. The term “safer sex” worked because it seemed doable, he added.

The safer-sex equivalent of an outdoor walk, most medical authorities say, is one that involves six feet of distance from others. (Linsey Marr, an engineering professor at Virginia Tech who studies how particles move through air, says she gives it 10 feet just to be cautious.) Governments are beginning to put in place rules to encourage people to spread out. This week, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo announced a pilot program in New York to close some streets to traffic in order to give pedestrians more space. As of Tuesday, the French must follow new restrictions on outdoor exercise: It can be done alone, for up to an hour a day, within a one-kilometer radius of home. Walkers and runners must carry permission slips that can be checked by authorities.

If the distancing rules are too strict, prohibiting excursions entirely, people could give up, said Dr. Carlos Del Rio, a public health and AIDS specialist at Emory University. “I want to be sure that people don’t get frustrated and say, ‘We won’t be able to defeat this,’ because we can,” he said.

“Our mental health is going to be so important,” added Dr. Spencer, who was treated for Ebola in 2014 and endured 19 days of near-total isolation. “This is only going to get worse.”

“Telling people to stay inside works right now, but in two or three weeks, it’s going to be a tough message to hold up,” he said.

Walks and runs are signs of life to which even doctors and scientists on the front lines are clinging. Amandine Gamble, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Los Angeles, is a co-author of that study that raised alarm last week about how the virus lingers in the air. She walks near her home in Santa Monica every day. She finds complete adherence to the six-foot rule challenging, she said, and if someone crosses her path, she does not panic.

Dr. Spencer spends his days treating Covid-19 patients at Columbia. When he comes home, he laces up his sneakers and goes jogging, sometimes late at night.

“It’s one of the only ways I can decompress and disconnect completely from coronavirus,” he said.

We called Ms. Motola to share what the experts had advised. She wasn’t convinced.

“I do have to sit and calculate the risk,” she said. “As soon as I contemplate putting on my sneakers, my anxiety goes right up.”

“One of these mornings I will be brave enough,” she said. “I have to be brave.”

Degrees, each letter costs 25K or more

The other large industrial complex next to the Legal and Medical is the Educational one and in fact they are the entire reason that the other two are beyond control.

President Obama has come up with an “idea” to reduce College costs, and that will go the way of pre school, green energy, the living wage and health care for all, in other words nowhere.  In our kick the can, histrionic my way the red vs the blue way, tea or coffee political arena, we do nothing but talk. I have lost count over the national discussions of late.  We had gun control, immigration reform, minimum wage rise, food stamps vs agricultural bailouts, sequestration, NSA, and a bunch of other stuff that I cannot recall or care about anymore.

So with the idea that College’s must be more responsible and in turn transparent and cheaper we have a lot of ideas and a lot of hyperbole that will go on a private jet to a College bowl game and sit in a private box, that is where it is going.

David Leonhardt wrote a recent blog post decrying the concept of rising College costs but I am afraid he is drinking from the same kool aid  cup that Andrew Ross Sorkin does when they decide that they know a lot about the rich but the middle class not so much.  I can’t be certain if they are that oblivious or simply afraid to bite the hands that feed?  I do believe these Gentlemen are just that and getting one’s shirt sleeves and french cuffs dirty are not their skill set. They are not unintelligent just unwilling to to actually speak to real people living on real wages.

And then we have the Vulture Capitalists paying Ivy League students (natch) to NOT go to College and instead come up with some absurd dot/app/bomb, my favorite so far the coffee spray, why drink it when you can just absorb it, in lieu of finishing their degree. What this really does it enables the progeny of the elite to gain further experience, contacts and distance from those who they should be learning to live and work and in turn build jobs, businesses and community.  But on a positive note it frees up a spot perhaps for a real student who would benefit from the Education.  Not that it matters as once these darlings get burned in the valley of the tears they can easily resume their education without any delay.  

The focus of STEM should just be T because there is no Science education anyone is engaging in.  This op-ed piece in the NYT I think adequately discusses the failure to attract the new generation Carl Sagan who spoke of billions of stars not as in the dollars behind some absurd crowd sourcing, lunch generating, coffee spraying app. 

Education should be like the Medical care we don’t get – affordable.  We should have an educated population regardless of their job pursuits and there should be living wages regardless of one’s education pursuits.  They are separate but equal issues.  We seem to forget that many of us like being Indians and not all of us our cut out to be Chiefs but that doesn’t mean we should be stupid.

Obama’s Plan Aims to Lower Cost of College

By TAMAR LEWIN
Published: August 22, 2013

A draft of the proposal, obtained by The New York Times and likely to cause some consternation among colleges, shows a plan to rate colleges before the 2015 school year based on measures like tuition, graduation rates, debt and earnings of graduates, and the percentage of lower-income students who attend. The ratings would compare colleges against their peer institutions. If the plan can win Congressional approval, the idea is to base federal financial aid to students attending the colleges partly on those rankings.

“All the things we’re measuring are important for students choosing a college,” a senior administration official said. “It’s important to us that colleges offer good value for their tuition dollars, and that higher education offer families a degree of security so students aren’t left with debt they can’t pay back.”

Mr. Obama hopes that starting in 2018, the ratings would be tied to financial aid, so that students at highly rated colleges might get larger federal grants and more affordable loans. But that would require new legislation.

“I think there is bipartisan support for some of these ideas, as we’ve seen in states where the governors have been working on them,” said the administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to disclose information not yet made public.

Ohio, Tennessee and Indiana have made moves toward linking aid to educational outcomes. But in the divisive Congressional atmosphere, it is not clear how much backing there would be for such proposals.

In February, the administration introduced an online college scorecard, making public some of the information to be included in the ratings, to help families evaluate different colleges. Graduates’ earnings, however, will be a new data point, and one that experts say is especially tricky to make meaningful.

“There are all kinds of issues, like deciding how far down the road you are looking, and which institutions are comparable,” said Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president of the American Council on Education, a group representing colleges and universities. “Ultimately, the concern is that the Department of Education will develop a formula and impose it without adequate consultation, and that’s what drives campus administrators nuts.”

Almost all of the federal government’s $150 billion in annual student aid is distributed based on the number of students a college enrolls, regardless of how many graduate or how much debt they incur. Under the new proposal, students could still attend whatever college they chose, public or private, but taxpayer support would shift to higher-ranked schools.

With rising tuition and declining state financing, students and families are assuming a growing share of college costs. Tuition revenues now make up about half of public university revenues, up from a quarter 25 years ago. And with colleges facing larger pensions, health care and technology costs, the pressure to keep raising tuition is intense.

The average borrower now graduates with more than $26,000 of debt. Loan default rates are rising, and only about half of those who start college graduate within six years.

Mr. Obama has focused on these concerns for some time, exhorting colleges and universities, and state legislators, to make higher education more affordable.

In his 2012 State of the Union address, he said he was putting colleges on notice that if tuition did not stop rising faster than inflation, financing from taxpayers would drop. And in this year’s State of the Union speech, he urged Congress to consider affordability and value in awarding federal aid, and followed up with a policy plan recommending that those measures be incorporated into the accreditation system.

Mr. Obama’s proposal urges colleges to experiment with approaches that reduce costs. The plan mentions so-called competency-based degrees, in which college credits are based not on the hours students spend in classrooms, but on how much they can show they know.

Another approach mentioned in the plan is online education through what have become known as “massive open online courses,” or MOOCs, which are mostly free. Mr. Obama also urged consideration of three-year degree programs and dual enrollment programs in which high school students can begin to earn college credits.

“This isn’t something that’s going to be fully driven by the federal government, but the president can tell colleges that there’s people out there doing good things, you should look at them, try them and try to do better — and here’s where we can help,” the official said.

There is some money available for such efforts, including $500 million for community colleges, and the administration is seeking more. So far, though, it has failed to persuade Congress to pay for Race to the Top competition for higher education, under which grants would go to those colleges with promising approaches.

With or without more financing, the president plans to offer regulatory waivers to colleges that serve as experimental sites promoting high-quality, low-cost innovations in higher education, especially those that make it possible for students to get financial aid based on how much they learn, rather than how much time they spend in class. He also wants to let colleges offer Pell Grants, federal aid based on need, to high school students taking college courses.

In a letter to supporters this week, Mr. Obama said that tinkering around the edges would not be enough, and that the changes he was proposing in his two-state, three-campus tour beginning Thursday, “won’t be popular with everyone — including some who’ve made higher education their business — but it’s past time that more of our colleges work better for the students they exist to serve.”

Mr. Obama is championing his ideas on a two-day bus tour, at town hall-style meetings on college campuses across upstate New York and Pennsylvania.

In the proposal, the president plans to change aid practices to make sure those receiving financial aid are moving toward a degree by, among other things, stretching out the disbursement of Pell Grant money over the semester, rather than giving it out in a lump sum at the start. While “satisfactory academic progress” is required by the current law, it is left to each institution to define such progress, and students who fail out of one college can simply transfer to another and receive more aid.

“That doesn’t make sense,” said Sandra Baum, an economist who is a senior fellow at the George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development. “Students need a structure that will help them make progress.”

Mr. Obama would also like to expand his existing pay-as-you-earn program for student borrowers so that borrowers could cap their payments at 10 percent of their discretionary monthly income. That expansion would require Congressional approval.

But even without it, the administration next year will direct the Education Department to call all debtors behind in their payments to make sure they understand repayment options.

Free Labour! Not the Party the Work.

That is how they spell labor  “across the pond”  and the below article shows that the obsession with free work is not confined to our shores at all.  The UK Guardian/Observer discusses the farce that is “internships” or as I call it the exploitation of young people desperate for work if they can get it.  Of course its not paid but the promise of hopefully, maybe, possibly turning into some type of paid job is the idea. And that is all it is an idea.

I wrote about the problem in the U.S. particularly with the fashion industry and its use of these type of indentured servitude gigs that are paid by the proximity of glamor as a substitute for pay, only to find out that the work is not so glamorous.  Well the Devil wears Prada don’t you know?  I think running to get a double mocha latte from Starbucks is better suited to Nike’s than Manolo Blahnik’s.

But what is more telling is that this again shows regardless of what side of the pond one lives the rich find ways to exploit, use and discriminate against those less so all under the guise of the Unicorn Myth apparently not just America – that you too can be rich if you just pull those boostraps up hard enough. Well let me assure leather worn down from heavy pulling breaks. 

Revealed: class divide at the heart of unpaid internships

Survey shows how employers are able to exploit graduates’ desperation to find work

After seven unpaid internships, Libby Page, 20, came to a rather dispiriting conclusion. “Enough is enough. I want to be a fashion journalist, but I can’t afford to work for free.”

It wasn’t an easy decision. Libby, whose family live in Dorset, had specifically chosen her London college so that she would have access to the internships, albeit unpaid, that she regarded as so vital for her career prospects.

She’d stacked up the loans to make London living possible. “I try not to think about it,” she admits. But looking around the national newspapers and magazines that were her final placements, Libby, a student at the London College of Fashion, realised that she didn’t stand a chance. “The others there had the money, lived in London and enjoyed the right connections. I just thought to myself: I can’t compete with these people.”
 
It is a sentiment shared by thousands of young men and women across the country.

Last year a row over unpaid internships, some placements lasting up to a year, and many exploitative, prompted promises of a crackdown from the political classes.

a poll commissioned by the National Union of Students, carried out by YouGov, reveals how far there is to go. One in five 18- to 24-year-olds (20%) has undertaken an internship, compared with just 2% of people who were of the same age 30 to 40 years ago.

Two out of five (43%) aged between 18 and 24 believe unpaid internships act or have acted as a major barrier to getting a job. Yet nearly three-quarters (73%) in that age bracket say that internships are a vital first step for a career in the media, two-thirds (63%) believe the same is true in politics, while the same proportion say that it is the same in fashion and finance (64%). Internships are a great way for people to start a career, according to three out of five of those young people.

Dupsy Abiola, a former barrister, who won £100,000 from Peter Jones on the BBC’s Dragons’ Den in October to run Intern Avenue, a firm placing young people in paid placements, says that when there are so many graduates and so few jobs the internship should now be regarded as an “entry-level position”.

But why, many ask, even in these straitened times, should they give their labour for free? Why does the national minimum wage not apply to the young trying to break into good careers? Why should fashion, media, finance and politics be reserved for the middle-class teenagers and 20-somethings who can afford not to earn a wage?

The survey of 2,794 people shows that, while one in 10 people in the ABC1 social grades – the upper to lower middle classes – have undertaken an unpaid internship, just 3% of those in the C2DE grade – skilled manual workers, shopworkers and the unemployed – have done the same. It is discriminatory and unfair, the NUS says, and according to the Low Pay Commission it is illegal.

Under employment law, people who work set hours, do set tasks and contribute value to an organisation are “workers” and are entitled to the minimum wage of £6.19 for those over 21 and £4.98 for 18- to 20-year-olds.

And yet it goes on. Tony Blair’s office faced the recent embarrassment of being revealed as a user of unpaid interns for three months at a time. He has since said that it won’t happen again.

Unpaid work lasting as long as six months has been advertised on the Commons website, Working for an MP. A Treasury minister, David Gauke, in charge of the HMRC responsible for prosecuting people who don’t pay a day’s wage for a day’s labour, placed an advert for a voluntary intern for a minimum of six months earlier this year.

Hazel Blears, the former Labour secretary of state for communities and local government, says she wants this changed. This week, she will introduce a bill to parliament that seeks to prohibit the advertising of long-term unpaid internships. It has received cross-party support, with sponsors of the bill including former foreign secretary David Miliband, the Liberal Democrat MPs Julian Huppert and Mike Crockart, and the Tory MP Eric Ollerenshaw.
 
Blears says the deputy prime minister is on-side.

“We have a system where unpaid internships are unlawful but it is lawful to advertise them. A few weeks ago, I went to see Nick Clegg and he was quite supportive. He thought it was a nonsense as well. We are trying to change behaviour here,” she said.

For good measure, tomorrow the TUC and the NUS launch their latest salvo calling for fair treatment of interns. The event at TUC headquarters in central London will begin a year of campaign activity for fairer and better internships. They say employers have sought to take advantage of graduates’ desperation to find work in the economic downturn and so see interns as a useful source of free labour. Others, they add, may be unaware that non-payment of interns is a breach of the law and of national minimum wage rules.

A new “Rights for Interns” smartphone application will be launched, so that if the employers don’t know their rights, at least the interns do.

Libby, who is now in her final year at fashion college, is fully behind the push. “For people like me, the idea of coming out of higher education and then being asked to work for free is absolutely terrifying,” she said. “But it also makes me angry.”